Yesterday Facebook, Google and Twitter appeared before the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, as part of the Committee’s inquiry into the violent consequences of hate crime.

The Committee’s Chair, the Rt Hon. Yvette Cooper MP set the tone of the discussion by noting: “We’ve seen too many cases of vile online hate crimes, harassment or threats where social media companies have failed to act. It cannot be beyond the wit and means of multi-billion dollar social media companies like Twitter, Facebook, and Google to develop ways to better protect users from hatred and abuse.”

The social networks were quickly put on the defensive, and the hearing had hugely embarrassing moments, for example when Google’s Peter Barron insisted that a YouTube video entitled “Jews admit organising White Genocide” would not be removed from the platform because it did not breach YouTube’s rules against hate speech. The companies remained on the defensive throughout the hearing, even towards the end when they each repeatedly refused to disclose how many staff they employ to review user reports.

There were also more positive moments, including when Twitter’s Nick Pickles revealed that the social network is now finally experimenting with technology to proactively seek out hateful content, something which Campaign Against Antisemitism has long urged, including in our meetings with Mr Pickles.

The Committee also probed why the social networks do not verify the identities of their users, making it easy to create fake accounts which can be used to direct abuse at other users, but the reasons given were unconvincing. Whereas there might be legitimate reasons to allow anonymity within war zones such as Syria, where verification is impossible in any case, there is no equivalent reason for failing to verify British users.

The companies were also quizzed on whether they will ever become effective at removing hateful content unless the UK legislates to force them to, like the legislatures of Germany and Israel. It sounded very much like the answer was ‘no’.

Campaign Against Antisemitism believes that internet giants must do much more to tackle hate crime on their platforms, particularly by developing proactive algorithms to take down antisemitic material in the same way that they already remove copyright material, or child abuse. We also believe that it is important for the social networks to verify the true identities of their users, and to provide evidence to police when British laws are broken, not only American laws.

Tom Harwood, a candidate to succeed Malia Bouattia as President of the National Union of Students, has released a video making a pledge to fight antisemitism one of his core manifesto promises. Decrying the loss of legitimacy suffered by the National Union of Students under Bouattia’s leadership, Harwood has identified antisemitism as an “advancing bigotry” which must urgently be tackled.

It is a damning indictment of the National Union of Students that a candidate has had to make fighting antisemitism within the union a major part of his election manifesto, and it is more damning still that this is newsworthy.

Bouattia has previously called Birmingham University a “Zionist outpost in higher education” because it has “the largest Jsoc [Jewish student society] in the country.” She has railed against “Zionist-led media outlets”, defended Palestinian terrorism as “resistance” and voted against condemning ISIS. When called on by Campaign Against Antisemitism and countless student leaders to retract her comments, she penned an article in The Guardian claiming that her accusers were simply sexists and racists. Bouattia since refused to confirm that Israel has a right to even exist, and told an audience at the School of Oriental and African Studies that the government’s anti-terrorism strategy is led by “Zionist and neo-con lobbies”. Last July Bouattia drew further condemnation when she used her casting vote to strip Jewish students of their ability to elect their own representative.

Student leaders have gone so far as to write open letters expressing embarrassment and apologising to Jewish students for the actions of Bouattia and the National Union of Students. The Union of Jewish Students has called for her resignation, as have other student groups including Oxford University Students’ Union. The House of Commons Home Affairs Committee’s Inquiry into the Rise of Antisemitism in Britain strongly criticised her.

A two-month inquiry launched to ascertain whether Bouattia is an antisemite found that Bouattia made comments that “could be reasonably capable of being interpreted as antisemitic”, but recommended that no disciplinary action be taken. Instead, Professor Carol Baxter, the NHS’s former equality chief who authored the report, proposed that Bouattia should apologise instead and escape any further consequence.

Update: An artist has now stepped forward and admitted that the sign was an ill-conceived piece of ‘street art’.

A ‘beware of the Jews’ sign has been found by Stamford Hill Shomrim. Attached to a lamppost, the sign mimics an official road sign indicating a hazard, but instead of warning of schoolchildren or a skid hazard, the sign warns of charedi Jews.

Shomrim has reported the sign to the Metropolitan Police Service and the local council.

Barry Bard, Supervisor at Stamford Hill Shomrim, said: “The sign has caused a lot of concern amongst local Jewish residents, especially as it is in such close proximity to a synagogue.”

After a public outcry, Wandsworth Borough Council has decided not to name a new housing development after Sir Edwin Alliot Verdon-Roe, accomplished aviator, antisemite and prominent member of the British Union of Fascists.

We encouraged our supporters to contact the Council and the local MP, Rosena Allin-Khan, spoke out against the move.

In a statement, Greenland Group, the property developer which had proposed honouring Verdon-Roe, said that Wandsworth Borough Council had requested that the name be changed, and that they had been unaware of Verdon-Roe’s politics.

Verdon-Roe supported Sir Oswald Mosley during the 1930s, a time when Mosley’s ‘blackshirt’ thugs terrorised London’s Jews. Dr Steven Woodbridge, Senior Lecturer in History at Kingston University, told the Evening Standard: “Even during the Second World War, he was contributing articles to the publications of extreme-right parties. I think his views would be abhorrent to people today. There was a definite strand of antisemitism in his thinking and outlook.”

We are pleased that Verdon-Roe, an ardent antisemite, will not be honoured.

A man and a woman enjoying afternoon tea at a gastropub in Belsize Park have reported that they were subjected to antisemitic abuse, causing them to leave. On Wednesday the couple were engaged in conversation when they were approached by a man who asked them if they were talking about “them”. When the couple asked to whom he was referring, his response was “the Jews”. He then embarked upon a tirade of antisemitic abuse invoking classical antisemitic tropes, allegedly including: “Jewish business is taking every penny.”

The couple who are not Jewish left the establishment in disgust. The matter has been reported to the police and the venue. Campaign Against Antisemitism is assisting the couple.

The alleged incident reportedly occurred at the Sir Richard Steele pub in Belsize Park, London, at approximately 16:00 on Wednesday 8th March. Anybody with information should call 101, using reference number CAD6542/08/03/2017.

A man has been sentenced to four years in prison by a judge at Peterborough Crown Court after being convicted of two counts of incitement to racial hatred over his antisemitic Facebook posts and a speech on YouTube at Cambridge Crown Court last year.

In December 2016, Lawrence Burns was found guilty of two charges of publishing threatening, abusive or insulting written material with intent or likely intent to stir up racial hatred by a jury at Cambridge Crown Court.

Jurors found him guilty after hearing how Burns, aged 26 from Coldham’s Lane in Cambridge, spoke in a YouTube video memorialising American white supremacist leader David Lane, accusing Jews of being “parasites” that wanted to create a “mongrelised race”.

Burns pleaded not guilty, but prosecutor Mark Weekes said: “This is a young man who is an extremist and has expressed racist views, particularly towards the Jewish and Afro-Caribbean community. On his public Facebook account, which has more than 90 friends, he expressed some of the vilest and most offensive sentiments possible. Many of the posts are abusive and insulting towards Jews, who he refers to as ‘sub human animals’.” In one post, Burns compared Jews to “maggots in a decaying body” who are “hijacking the genes of a superior white race”.

Adrian Davis, who was defending Burns said he was a “rash young man” who had never intended his words to be read by a wide audience.

Students have been shocked by two antisemitic graffiti attacks at the University of Sussex. A grotesque message has been discovered by Sussex Friends of Israel on a blackboard located at Library Square: “Jet fuel can’t melt Jews. Holocaust was an inside job.” In another incident, a poster was defaced with swastikas. The poster, advertising a talk by Yoav and Horit Herman Peled, was titled “The religionisation of Israeli society.”

Student’s Union President, Annie Pickering, was quoted in the university newspaper saying: “The swastikas have scared us as much as anyone else and we are working with students and the university to remove the signs and if possible work out who is behind this.” The Vice Chancellor, Adam Tickell, tried to reassure students, saying: “I want to assure everyone in our community that you are safe here. Whatever your race, religion, gender identity, sexuality or age, or if you have a disability – Sussex is your home and you will be protected from discrimination or abuse. We have taken immediate action in this particular instance and will not tolerate any acts which are illegal or incite hatred.”

Last month, Campaign Against Antisemitism helped to expose an upcoming Friends of Palestine event scheduled at the University of Sussex for 2nd March as part of Israeli Apartheid Week. The event was billed as “Palestine: 100 Years of Settler-Colonialism. 100 Years of Popular Struggle for Justice.” We were extremely concerned by the controversial speakers, Aja Monet and Farid Esack and wrote to the university following requests from a number of students. The event went ahead and our Regulatory Enforcement Unit is now considering taking further action.

Some universities such as the University of Exeter and the University of Central Lancashire showed principled leadership and banned ‘Israeli Apartheid Week events’. A spokesperson for the University of Central Lancashire said that they banned the event for contravening the International Definition of Antisemitism. The University of Sussex should have followed this precedent.

There is clearly a climate of intense concern for Jewish students resulting from ‘Israeli Apartheid Weeks’ at universities across the country, which repeated incidents such as these graffiti attacks are consolidating.

Campaign Against Antisemitism calls on universities to step up their moral and legal obligation to protect Jewish students. We are keen to hear from students who are experiencing antisemitism on campus, or who are aware of recent and future events of concern via e-mail at [email protected].

Afzal Khan CBE, whose tweet compared the Israeli Government to Nazis, has confirmed that he will be standing in the selection to be the Labour Party’s candidate in the by-election to replace the late Sir Gerald Kaufman MP in the seat of Manchester Gorton. Khan is a Labour Member of the European Parliament for the North West.

His candidacy has already gained the support of senior figures within the powerful Communication Workers’ Union and GMB union.

After 33 years as the MP for Manchster Gorton, the late Sir Gerald Kaufman left Manchester Gorton as the ninth safest Labour seat in the country. In October 2015, Sir Gerald delivered an antisemitic speech to MPs on the Parliamentary Estate, and just like in the case of Khan, the Labour Party refused to investigate or discipline him.

On 2nd August 2014, Khan tweeted a link to an article from which he quoted that “The Israeli Government are [sic] acting like Nazi’s [sic] in Gaza.”

According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, which was first devised by the European Union itself and has been adopted by the British Government, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic.

Khan’s use of the slur was surprising given his prominence in interfaith dialogue work. He is co-founder of The Muslim-Jewish Forum of Greater Manchester and was awarded a CBE for his community and interfaith work in 2008.

The Labour Party refused to investigate or discipline Khan for his tweet and instead offered a pitifully weak statement: “These views are not shared by the Labour Party and Afzal Khan MEP has been reminded of his responsibilities as a Labour representative.”

If Khan believes that Israeli policy is to act like Nazis then according to the International Definition of Antisemitism, he is an antisemite. If that is so, and he is selected as the Labour Party candidate in Manchester Gorton, the Jewish community could be in for years of torment — the Labour Party would have swapped one antisemite for another.

https://twitter.com/akhanmep/status/839112689410584577

Disgraced Labour activist, Jackie Walker, who is currently suspended from the Labour Party, has had her case referred to the party’s National Consitutional Committee (NCC). The 11-member NCC has the power to expel individuals from the party. Walker was suspended by Labour in September 2016 following comments she made about Holocaust Memorial Day at the Labour Party Conference.

The JC reported that at a meeting of Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) in central London it was decided that the allegations were serious enough to push the hearing up to the party’s NCC.

The paper also reported that Marc Wadsworth has also had his hearing referred to the NCC. Wadsworth, a Labour activist, was suspended after accusing Jewish Labour MP Ruth Smeeth of conspiring with the media at the launch event of Baroness Chakrabarti’s whitewash report into antisemitism. Smeeth fled the event in tears whilst Chakrabarti and Jeremy Corbyn stood by inertly.

At last year’s Labour conference in Liverpool, during a training session on tackling antisemitism, Walker said that Holocaust Memorial Day is not inclusive enough and that Jewish schools do not need special security.

Walker, a leading ally of Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and the former Vice-Chair of the hard-left Momentum group, said that Holocaust Memorial Day should be “open to all peoples who’ve experienced Holocaust” and as delegates angrily heckled her, she told the room: “I was a bit concerned…at your suggestions that the Jewish community is under such threat that they have to use security in all its buildings…I have a grandson, he is a year old. There is security in his nursery and every school has security now. It’s not because I’m frightened or his parents are frightened that he is going to be attacked.” She earlier said that antisemitism was being “exaggerated” to “undermine Jeremy.”

Labour’s failure to act over allegations of antisemitism has been chilling. Campaign Against Antisemitism hopes that this time with Walker and Wadsworth it will be different. However, with Labour’s appalling track record, we have little confidence.

It is worth noting that although the egregious behaviour of Jackie Walker appears, finally, to be being dealt with, even longer standing disciplinary cases, such as those of Ken Livingstone’s offensive claims that Hitler supported Zionism and the antisemitic members of the Oxford University Labour Club, are still waiting to be heard. Many more remain cloaked in secrecy under the terms of the notorious Chakrabarti report.

This reluctance has provided a fetid place for antisemitism to breed, and that delay has in itself allowed older antisemitic conspiracy theories to flourish, such as the conspiracy myth that the Rothschild family exerts financial control over central banks.

We hope that justice will be done, and be seen to be done, however, with Labour’s appalling track record we have little confidence that it will be.

In a landmark High Court judicial review action brought by Campaign Against Antisemitism, the Crown Prosecution Service has been forced to cancel its decision not to prosecute a neo-Nazi leader, Jeremy Bedford-Turner. The CPS had repeatedly refused to prosecute him.

After capitulating to CAA unequivocally after an extended legal battle, just days before a High Court hearing, the CPS must now ask a senior lawyer to reconsider whether to prosecute.

In a speech to neo-Nazis surrounded by police in July 2015, Bedford-Turner said that: “…all politicians are nothing but a bunch of puppets dancing to a Jewish tune, and the ruling regimes in the West for the last one hundred years have danced to the same tune.” Evoking medieval libels which claimed that Jews drank the blood of non-Jewish children, Bedford-Turner told his followers, of whom one third were from the violent extreme-right National Rebirth of Poland group, that the French Revolution and both World Wars were massacres perpetrated by Jews. He concluded that England was “merry” during the period of the expulsion of Jews from England and demanded: “Let’s free England from Jewish control.” The speech was filmed and posted on YouTube, where it remains.

The speech was made in a kettling pen in Westminster. The neo-Nazis had sought to march through Golders Green but were prevented from doing so by police due to a large counterdemonstration mobilised by CAA.

The CPS took over five months to decide not to prosecute the case, deciding that there was no realistic prospect of a jury finding that Bedford-Turner’s speech amounted to incitement to racial or religious hatred (using threatening, abusive, or insulting words or behaviour with the intention (or likely consequence) of stirring up racial or religious hatred). CAA’s Chairman, Gideon Falter, who had witnessed the speech, applied for Victims’ Right to Review, but was told by the CPS that he was not a victim and had no victim’s rights.

Faced with no alternative, CAA took the unusual step of issuing judicial review proceedings to submit the CPS decision to the scrutiny of the High Court.

CAA was partly motivated by a growing concern that the CPS is failing to take antisemitic crime seriously. 2015, the year in which the crime was committed, was the worst year on record for antisemitic hate crime. Yet of 15,442 prosecutions of hate crimes by the CPS, only 12 were prosecutions of antisemitic hate crime.

Whilst waiting for the High Court to decide whether to allow CAA to proceed, the case was brought to the attention of the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Executive of the CPS who remained intransigent.

On 6th January 2017, the Hon. Mr Justice Haddon-Cave gave CAA’s judicial review permission to proceed on all grounds and limited CAA’s cost liability to zero. He held that this case “raises potentially important issues for society in this growing area of racist and religious hate crime.” The case was expedited to be held before a Divisional Court of the Administrative Division of the High Court today, Wednesday 8th March.

On the eve of the hearing, after more than a year of maintaining that her decision was correct, the Director of Public Prosecutions agreed that the decision should be quashed and taken again by a more senior lawyer.

The Director of Public Prosecutions’ capitulation comes as a representative survey of 1,864 British Jews found extremely low confidence in the CPS and the authorities. CAA’s 2016 Antisemitism Barometer research has not yet been published, however CAA has released the results from the research pertaining to confidence in the CPS:

  • Only 26% of British Jews think the CPS does enough to protect British Jews.
  • Only 23% of British Jews think that the authorities are doing enough to address and punish antisemitism.
  • Only 46% of British Jews have confidence that if they reported a hate crime, it would be prosecuted if there was enough evidence.

Gideon Falter, Chairman of CAA said: “We are delighted by this result, but for more than a year it has been clear that the DPP could not win. It is a disgrace that we have had to litigate for the DPP to reconsider the absurd decision not to prosecute this brazen neo-Nazi. The question now is why the CPS seems to demonstrate such incompetence in dealing with cases of antisemitism. Despite record levels of antisemitic crime, there are dismally few prosecutions of antisemites in Britain every year. Antisemites are becoming bolder and British Jews are losing faith in the authorities. The CPS must stop making excuses and prosecute antisemites with zero tolerance. If they do not, we will continue to hold them to account in court.”

Brian Kennelly QC, leading counsel in the judicial review, said: “The CPS has acknowledged that in future it must apply Article 17 of the European Human Rights Convention in cases of antisemitic hate speech. This provides that the right to free speech does not extend to those who would destroy that right.”

Jamie Susskind, junior counsel in the judicial review, said: “I hope that this case will mark a watershed in how the CPS chooses to prosecute cases of hardcore antisemitism. The CPS lawyers appeared to believe that a neo-Nazi’s right to free speech enabled him to say almost anything — no matter how grotesque, threatening, or hateful. This stance was wrong as a matter of law — none of us has an unqualified right to say things that aim to destroy the rights of others (in this case, the Jews). The CPS’s misunderstanding of the law may explain why so few antisemitic hate crimes have been prosecuted in the recent past. Following this decision, this needs to change — so that neo-Nazis and others are held to account for their crimes and the Jewish community can feel safe.”

CAA was represented pro bono by leading counsel Brian Kennelly QC, junior counsel Jamie Susskind, and solicitor David Sonn. The entire CAA team would like to thank our lawyers for the hundreds of hours that they have donated to this case. It would have been impossible for us to pursue this without their generosity. It is due to their devotion and skill that we have achieved this result.

We now await the CPS’s new decision on whether to prosecute Jeremy Bedford-Turner. Later this month, CAA will be in court again, privately prosecuting Alison Chabloz.

Your donations help us continue to hold the authorities to account and enforce the law.
Please support CAA today by donating online. If you would like to make a major donation to help fund our litigation work, or know someone who would, please e-mail [email protected].

Such is the threat of antisemitism that authorities are taking extraordinary precautions. To prepare for the worst, the Metropolitan Police Service training campus in Aerodrome Road, Hendon, hosted a training exercise on 27th February to simulate an antisemitic terrorist attack. North West London Shomrim, a Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol, were actively involved in the exercise along with Hatzola, CST, the police, fire brigade and ambulance service.

“If there were ever to be an antisemitic terrorist attack in the UK, chances are incredibly high it would happen in Barnet,” Borough Commander Detective Chief Superintendent Simon Rose told the Hendon Times. He added: “Hopefully this would never happen — but we need to make sure we are ready in case it does.”

To simulate a terrorist incident in the heart of London’s Jewish community, a large lorry was driven at speed down a mock street, smashing into cars and pedestrians. Emergency services were left to deal with actors with life-threatening injuries and were told that due to leaking petrol they should follow procedures for an incident with a risk of an explosion. The mock terrorist, was still behind the wheel of the lorry, and had to be contained but also treated for his injuries. Assisted by Shomrim and CST, the police took control of the scene whilst London Ambulance Service and the London Fire Brigade treated victoms, assisted by Hatzola.

DCSI Rose concluded: “We need to be ready for this so we aren’t caught short if it ever happens. While I can’t say our performance was perfect today, there will be an extensive debrief to work through what can be improved. This has been a valuable day for everyone and I’m proud of all those involved for their contribution to making our community safer.”

A director of Southgate Auction Rooms has declared that “A lot of Jewish people actually buy Nazi memorabilia” in response to being caught auctioning Nazi propaganda.

Jim Noland made the comment when asked by the Enfield Independent.

Two election posters, one declaring “Only Hitler”, were adorned with swastikas and were listed for auction last week. One of the posters was sold for £90 and the other is still listed on the Southgate Auction Rooms’ website.

The sale of Nazi memorabilia is illegal in a host of countries but not in Britain. However, established British auction houses, refuse to sell Nazi memorabilia as does online auction site eBay.

Robert Dulin, the chairman of the Southgate Progressive Synagogue, told the Enfield Independent: “I think it’s despicable not only that people auction it, but that people buy these things. I’d understand if it was in a museum as they are historical artefacts – but for someone to want something associated with such a regime is unthinkable.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism strongly opposes the sale of Nazi memorabilia.

A swastika was etched onto wooden panelling in the male toilets at Broadwalk Centre in Edgware. The Centre is popular with the large Jewish community in the area and hosts Chanukah celebrations.

The shopping centre management has pledged to take “swift action” to remove the swastika that was discovered last Wednesday. In the meantime, they have covered up the swastika temporarily and will replace the panel it is etched onto to fully remove it.

A spokesperson for the shopping centre told local Jewish media that they “were shocked and dismayed” to find the swastika, saying: “The symbol in question was etched into a panel which we have completely and securely covered with a wooden board and we will replace the panel itself as soon as possible. We will not accept any form of vandalism in the centre. Anyone caught will be banned from the centre and will be reported to the police.”

The broadcasting regulator, Ofcom, has confirmed in a letter to Campaign Against Antisemitism that it has launched a formal investigation into Al Jazeera’s so-called documentary, “The Lobby”, following our complaint. Ofcom has completed their assessment of the programme they have launched a formal investigation into the programme’s compliance with the Broadcasting Code.

The investigation has been officially listed in Ofcom’s Broadcast and On Demand Bulletin. In particular, Ofcom is investigating whether the programme complied with rules in Sections Two (harm and offence) and Section Five (impartiality) of the Broadcasting Code. In addition, they are also investigating complaints of unfair treatment and infringement of privacy of a number of individuals featured in the programme.

“The Lobby” was premised on a remark by a junior Israeli Embassy employee and an MP’s former adviser. From one brief conversation, the programme attempted to extrapolate the existence of a full-bodied conspiracy, including the suggestion that swathes of the British Jewish community are in league with the Israeli government to subvert British democracy. In our complaint, our Regulatory Enforcement Unit alleged that the programme breached several core Principles of the Broadcasting Code, including accuracy, impartiality, fair treatment of individuals, harmful material and incitement.

Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomes this formal investigation and keenly awaits the outcome.

Campaign Against Antisemitism has published a pitifully-short list of prosecutions for antisemitic hate crime since 2015.

Though antisemitic hate crime has risen to record levels, the list of prosecutions by the Crown Prosecution Service remains disturbingly short.

Hundreds of antisemitic hate crimes are recorded every year, but the number of prosecutions has not even reached two dozen prosecutions per annum. To put this in perspective, in 2015, the last year for which figures have been released by the Crown Prosecution Service, 15,422 hate crimes were prosecuted.

The list of prosecutions for antisemitism is available on our website.

The Jewish festival of Purim is now a week away. It celebrates the salvation of the Jews of ancient Persia from an antisemitic genocide masterminded by the king’s second in command. The Jews’ salvation is secured with the blessing of the king, but it is delivered by the Jews themselves, who are simply given permission to fight to prevent the planned bloodbath.

Thankfully we live in very different times, but the echoes of the Holocaust remind us that it was not so long ago that such machinations were successful.

Even in modern Britain, antisemitism is still present and it is growing. Whilst the British state defends its Jews from antisemitism, sometimes that protection is not forthcoming. Indeed this month, Campaign Against Antisemitism will be in court due to correct dismal failures by the Crown Prosecution Service.

Our team consists of talented volunteers who give many thousands of hours of their time, day in, day out, to defend British Jews and British society at large from the corrosive disease of antisemitism. Supported by our two brilliant employees, our charity takes robust action against antisemitism, including groundbreaking legal work. We do so working closely with the government, whose respect we have earned because when the authorities fail to act, we hold them to account, even in court when necessary.

We do what we do because this is the fight for the future of British Jews and we cannot afford to lose.

We continue to rely on your donations to cover the costs our work.

This Purim, if you care about the future of British society and British Jews, please help us to beat antisemitism back into the shadows by volunteering or donating. We are reliant upon you for success.

We wish all of our Jewish supporters a Purim sameach.

Image credit: Facsimile Editions

Middle East Eye has produced a video showing students from around the UK complaining that their ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ events had been banned over antisemitism or public safety fears. The video provides an insight into the mindset of activists who appear to believe that the bans are politically motivated and an assault on freedom of speech, and who seem not to recognise any problems whatsoever with the events that they were planning to organise.

A number of universities have banned ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ events over the last couple of week (though it is called ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’, the events tend to span two or three weeks).

The bans follow the adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism by the government following a sustained campaign by Campaign Against Antisemitism, Sir Eric Pickles and others.

Minister of State for Universities, Jo Johnson MP, wrote to Universities UK earlier this month asking that all universities be conscious of the definition as ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ approached. Universities have responded with bans on events that they feared would be antisemitic, extremist or dangerous to the public. This week the Prime Minister weighed in, calling on all universities to adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism.

The bans came as Campaign Against Antisemitism released urgent guidance to students dealing with antisemitic incidents during ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’. Students with questions are very welcome to contact our specialist team by e-mailing [email protected].

Abdul Ahaed, 29, has been convicted of racially abusing a hostel worker and then shouting antisemitic abuse at a police officer after arrest.

Ahaed was arrested on 26th November 2016 after police were called to a disturbance at a hostel in north London. During an altercation with a member of staff, Ahaed called him a “Black n*****”. Police arrived and arrested Ahaed for racial abuse. Ahaed became very abusive to police and while at the police station, shouted “Jewish c***” on two separate occasions at a police officer.

The Metropolitan Police Service Case Progression Unit in Hackney conducted an investigation Ahaed was charged with abusing the hostel worker and the officer. Ahaed pleaded guilty at Wood Green Crown Court to two counts of racially aggravated intentional harassment alarm and distress.

He was sentenced on 24th February 2017 to a 12-month community order, a 6-week curfew between 23:00 and 6:00, a 10-day rehabilitation activity requirement, a victim surcharge of £85 and payments of £100 each to the hostel worker and the police officer.

Campaign Against Antisemitism thanks the Metropolitan Police Service for dealing with this antisemitic and racist incident robustly.

Two men have been arrested after allegedly shouting antisemitic abuse including death threats at Jewish people walking to synagogue in Stamford Hill in London. The two adults, described only as a black man and a white man reportedly began shouting abuse at 09:00 yesterday morning as Jewish families made their way to synagogue, at one point even entering the front garden of a synagogue.

Stamford Hill Shomrim, the Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol, assisted officers from the Metropolitan Police Service in arresting the men.

Wandsworth Borough Council has decided to name a new housing development after Sir Edwin Alliot Verdon-Roe, accomplished aviator, antisemite and prominent member of the British Union of Fascists.

Verdon-Roe supported Sir Oswald Mosley during the 1930s, a time when Mosley’s ‘blackshirt’ thugs terrorised London’s Jews. Dr Steven Woodbridge, Senior Lecturer in History at Kingston University, told the Evening Standard: “Even during the Second World War, he was contributing articles to the publications of extreme-right parties. I think his views would be abhorrent to people today. There was a definite strand of antisemitism in his thinking and outlook.”

It is disappointing, and unacceptable that, notwithstanding Verdon-Roe’s achievements in the field of aviation, Wandsworth Borough Council has decided to bestow the honour of naming a new development after him.

Campaign Against Antisemitism urges the Council to reconsider their decision and choose a more appropriate figure to name the building after.

You may wish to e-mail Wandsworth Borough Council’s leader, Councillor Ravi Govindia CBE, at [email protected] to let him know your thoughts.

On Monday, 244 academics attacked Campaign Against Antisemitism and the International Definition of Antisemitism in a letter published in The Guardian (and not for the first time either). The academics claimed that we were stifling criticism of Israel rather than acting against genuine Jew-hatred. It was not long before The Independent was repeating the claims.

Neither paper had the decency to seek our comment before publishing the claims and indeed The Guardian initially refused to publish our reply to the letter.

After we lodged a formal complaint against The Guardian and The IndependentThe Guardian agreed to publish the following letter. We will continue to pursue the outstanding elements of our complaints.

Sir,

The International Definition of Antisemitism adopted by the Prime Minister following a long campaign does not conflate antisemitism and criticism of Israel. Those who oppose the definition are simply blind to Jew-hatred. When the lynch mob of academics who wrote to you read the definition, they will have seen that it says that “criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic”. Their letter is therefore a deceit, because they claim that all they want to do is rationally criticise Israel and they fear that we will call them antisemites. That would be conflation of antisemitism with criticism of Israel, and as they well know, under this definition they have nothing to fear.

What the definition does consider to be antisemitic is calling Jews or the Jewish state the successor to the Nazis. That is not criticism, it is hate speech. The definition equally calls those who engage in spreading conspiracy myths about Jewish subterfuge and nefarious power antisemites, and of course the definition is right.

The 244 academics who signed the letter condemning Campaign Against Antisemitism are, in fact, engaging in the greatest of academic crime: dishonesty. It is therefore no wonder that we have asked students to gather evidence of antisemitism and send it to us so that we can take it up with universities.

Today, everybody carries in their pockets a high-definition video camera and so Jewish students are thankfully able to prove that they are being intimidated and abused, and we are able to help them. That must be what these academics fear: they fear that the particular brand of antisemitism that disguises itself as discourse about Israel is finally becoming political, social and professional suicide.

This recognition of the full spectrum of antisemitism comes not a moment too soon: on campuses where “oppression” is so frequently discussed, Jewish students are being squeezed out of student life. That is why the Minister of State for Universities has had to take a stand against bullying, unaccountable academics and student leaders who have long enjoyed partaking in the oldest hatred of all.

The International Definition of Antisemitism has been endorsed by thirty-one nations now, not out of fealty to Israel but out of recognition that antisemitism rots society from within, and that Jews are sadly, as ever, on the front line.

Yours sincerely,

Gideon Falter
Chairman, Campaign Against Antisemitism

You may wish to draw the inaccuracies in the academics’ letter to the attention of [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected].

Today, in response to a question from Bob Blackman MP about antisemitism on campuses during ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’, the Prime Minister emphatically endorsed the Minister of State for Universities’ call for universities to adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism. This is an extremely welcome development and comes as universities around the country have banned ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ events over antisemitism fears.

Nevertheless, Baroness Amos, Director of the School of Oriental and African Studies, told Campaign Against Antisemitism that she will not even consider adopting the definition.

Please ask Jo Johnson MP, Minister of State for Universities, to intervene at SOAS by e-mailing [email protected] and [email protected]. Please copy in [email protected]. You may also want to thank Bob Blackman for raising antisemitism during ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ at Prime Minister’s Questions, by e-mailing [email protected].

Last week, Campaign Against Antisemitism published a new guide for students defending their campus against antisemitism during ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’.

On Monday, 244 academics attacked Campaign Against Antisemitism and the International Definition of Antisemitism in a letter published in The Guardian (and not for the first time either). The academics claimed that we were stifling criticism of Israel rather than acting against genuine Jew-hatred. It was not long before The Independent was repeating the claims.

Neither paper had the decency to seek our comment before publishing the claims and indeed The Guardian has now refused to publish our reply to the letter. We have made formal complaints to both The Guardian and The Independent, but in the meantime we are publishing the response that The Guardian refused to print.

Sir,

The International Definition of Antisemitism adopted by the Prime Minister following a long campaign does not conflate antisemitism and criticism of Israel. Those who oppose the definition are simply blind to Jew-hatred. When the lynch mob of academics who wrote to you read the definition, they will have seen that it says that “criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic”. Their letter is therefore a deceit, because they claim that all they want to do is rationally criticise Israel and they fear that we will call them antisemites. That would be conflation of antisemitism with criticism of Israel, and as they well know, under this definition they have nothing to fear.

What the definition does consider to be antisemitic is calling Jews or the Jewish state the successor to the Nazis. That is not criticism, it is hate speech. The definition equally calls those who engage in spreading conspiracy myths about Jewish subterfuge and nefarious power antisemites, and of course the definition is right.

The 244 academics who signed the letter condemning Campaign Against Antisemitism are, in fact, engaging in the greatest of academic crime: dishonesty. It is therefore no wonder that we have asked students to gather evidence of antisemitism and send it to us so that we can take it up with universities.

Today, everybody carries in their pockets a high-definition video camera and so Jewish students are thankfully able to prove that they are being intimidated and abused, and we are able to help them. That must be what these academics fear: they fear that the particular brand of antisemitism that disguises itself as discourse about Israel is finally becoming political, social and professional suicide.

This recognition of the full spectrum of antisemitism comes not a moment too soon: on campuses where “oppression” is so frequently discussed, Jewish students are being squeezed out of student life. That is why the Minister of State for Universities has had to take a stand against bullying, unaccountable academics and student leaders who have long enjoyed partaking in the oldest hatred of all.

The International Definition of Antisemitism has been endorsed by thirty-one nations now, not out of fealty to Israel but out of recognition that antisemitism rots society from within, and that Jews are sadly, as ever, on the front line.

Yours sincerely,

Gideon Falter
Chairman, Campaign Against Antisemitism

You may wish to draw the inaccuracies in the academics’ letter to the attention of [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected].

Jaroslaw Goloshko has been convicted of a racially aggravated public order offence after choosing to spend his Christmas Day last year shouting “Heil Hitler” and performing a Nazi salute directed at Jewish passersby. Goloshko was spotted by volunteers from Shomrim Stamford Hill whilst out on patrol. They followed him and called the police who came and arrested him.

Shomrim volunteers do not simply alert the police to antisemitic criminals; they also provide statements and regularly give evidence in court, which is what they did in this case, helping to ensure that Goloshko was convicted.

Goloshko did not appear in court and was convicted in his absence. The court issued a warrant for his arrest.

Councillor Jonny Morris, 49, a Labour Party Councillor on Plymouth City Council, has been suspended from the Labour Party after he was caught on camera giving a Nazi salute during a budget meeting in Devon.

Councillor Tudor Evans, leader of the Plymouth Labour group, confirmed that Councillor Morris had been suspended while the matter was investigated. He said “The whips are now looking into the matter. Obviously we take this very seriously.”

Devon and Cornwall Police confirmed that they have been made aware of the shocking incident which is being investigated as a public order offence.

Councillor Morris claims he became “angry” after Conservative and UKIP councillors cut the debate on the budget short by calling for the vote to be taken. He was then captured on footage which was being live streamed online performing the offensive gesture at his Tory and UKIP rivals.

This prompted councillors within the chamber to voice their disgust and immediately call for him to apologise. After the meeting Councillor Morris apologised, saying: “I was very angry at the closing down of debate on Plymouth’s budget by the UKIP/Tory ruling group. I let that anger get the better of me, and made an inappropriate and offensive gesture. I apologise unreservedly.”

The Conservative leader of the council, Councillor Ian Bowyer, said the act could be considered a hate crime. He said “I think the Council’s monitoring officer will doubtless wish to investigate further — there are potentially serious consequences here. Although Councillor Morris apologised for his behaviour in my opinion this constitutes hate crime, which is totally unacceptable.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism commends the local Labour Councillors for their swift and firm action. Unfortunately, we can have no confidence that the national Labour Party will take this matter as seriously. Following Baroness Chakrabarti’s whitewash report into antisemitism in the Labour Party, the Party has kept disciplinary decisions secret whilst even unremorseful antisemites are being readmitted to the Party.

ISIS terrorists have called on their supporters to terrorise Jewish communities in the West, singling out the UK. This frightening call to arms emerged on an ISIS-linked Telegram channel called Lone Mujahid which is a chat room where aspiring terrorists are encourage to carry out “lone-wolf” attacks.

A chilling message contains a list of Jewish communities in the UK above a photograph of, Amedy Coulibaly, the terrorist who murdered four Jews in a kosher supermarket in Paris. The photograph is captioned, “Take the brother’s (rh) example and terrorize the Yahood (Jew).”

Another post urged fellow extremists to disguise themselves as Jews: “IF YOU’RE STILL IN THE WEST! Dress up like a Jew! Go to your nearest Jewish area! Make sure you have plenty of weapons under you coat! Then unleash the pain of the Muslims upon these A.P.E.S!!!.”

In December 2016, the channel posted a call to jihadists to prepare and launch attacks to coincide with Christmas, Chanukah and the new year celebrations. “Christmas, Hanukah and New Years Day is very soon InshaAllah. So let’s prepare a gift for the filthy pigs / apes,” reads one post, below a screenshot of a pressure cooker bomb-making tutorial.

There have been several other ISIS attacks on Jewish targets across the world. In May 2014, Mehdi Nemmouche, killed four people at the Jewish Museum in Brussels in the name of ISIS.

While the passing of Sir Gerald Kaufman MP is undoubtedly sad for his family and friends, it also marks the loss of an opportunity. Sir Gerald was the first Labour politician of the Corbyn period to have gone unpunished after publicly uttering indisputably antisemitic lies.

By saying that “Jewish money” was used to subvert the British government, he was complicit in a centuries-old chorus of those accusing Jews of conspiracy and of showing disloyalty to their own country. This is explicit antisemitism: the International Definition of Antisemitism (as adopted by the Labour Party) explicitly states that “Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions” is antisemitic.

At the same meeting he was also recorded saying: “…because perhaps I can tell you in a way no-one else can tell you” — intimating that his having being born Jewish afforded him a protection which intimidated others into silence. Is political correctness in the face of antisemitism any less weak and immoral when applied to Jews?

Not only did the Labour Party shame themselves by their failure to discipline Sir Gerald, but Parliament did so itself doubly: the comments were made on the Parliamentary Estate, before an audience including the Shadow Secretary of State for Justice, and Sir Gerald held the affectionate and respectful title of Father of the House. Our subsequent complaint was met by a Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards ruling that his remarks did not bring Parliament into disrepute and refusal to investigate. Then and now, we refuse to take this for any kind of reasonable answer.

Sir Gerald Kaufman MP is dead: it is only right that a period of reflection should be allowed as his friends and family reflect and grieve for a man whom they no doubt had diverse reasons to love and respect. We too offer our condolences.

By his passing, however, he can no longer be disciplined by British institutions that should have acted. His actions and words now hang in the air, continuing to embolden other antisemites to the detriment of the UK’s Jewish community, and society at large.

Sir Gerald has therefore left a rotting stain on both the Labour Party and Parliament that will continue to eat away at both institutions until such time as genuine and public acts of regret and apology are made.

Until then, Campaign Against Antisemitism will continue in our aim of seeing Britain’s institutions free of antisemitism; ensuring that they are not places that quietly give poisonous racism a pass because it happened to come out of the mouth of a rather harmless-looking old Jewish man who happened to be our longest-serving MP.

The Liberal Democrat candididate for Mayor of Greater Manchester, Councillor Jane Brophy, has made an extraordinary attack on UK Independence Party (UKIP) candidate and orthodox Jew, Shneur Odze, saying he is unsuitable to stand for Mayor because of his religious beliefs.

Councillor Brophy made this outrageous slur which was captured on video at an LGBT campaign event that Mr Odze was unable to attend due it being held on the Sabbath. She stated that he was unsuitable to be a candidate because of his religious belief of not having physical contact with women. It is also disturbing that her comments received applause from some in the audience.

Mr Odze responded to the apalling smear in a statement posted on social media: “I find it shocking and ignorant for Councillor Brophy to have made these comments. This is not just an attack on myself personally; she is effectively saying no orthodox Jew can stand for public office anywhere.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism calls on the leadership of the Liberal Democats, a party that prides itself on being open, inclusive and tolerant, to immediately discipline and repudiate Councillor Brophy for her comments and apologise to the orthodox Jewish community for their candidate’s inference that orthodox Jews are not fit for public office.

The Jewish Museum in London was evacuated yesterday following a bomb threat. Thankfully the threat was a hoax. One hundred people, including children from two schools, were visiting at the time.

A spokesperson for the museum told the JC that the museum “was evacuated as a precaution following a security alert.” CST and police were called to the scene to implement security procedures.

The incident follows a series of bomb threats against Jewish institutions worldwide, including a bomb threat against Jewish schools in London.

Image credit: Graham Hale

When Baroness Tonge opens her mouth to speak on a subject involving Jews, then it is near-guaranteed that her utterances will cause offence. Her track record, from invoking the blood libel to hosting an event in Parliament where Jews were blamed for the Holocaust, is without parallel for a peer, and has earned her — along with Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party — the second-highest spot on the Simon Wiesenthal Centre’s global top 10 antisemites of 2016, as well as jumping before she was pushed following suspension from the Liberal Democrat party. Her views are vile and discredited. We were therefore unsurprised that she signed up to a petition proposed by notorious antisemite Tony Greenstein, demanding that the Charity Commission shuts Campaign Against Antisemitism down.

In a Daily Mail article yesterday morning, Mr Greenstein’s petition was scorned by both MPs and peers alike with comments including that it was “a sad comment on the rise of hate speech”, “a ridiculous attempt to close down an organisation fighting antisemitism”, “…absurd, and perhaps motivated by fear…[which] demonstrates just how effective the Campaign Against Antisemitism has been…”, “The CAA deserves every support and we need real antisemites to be shown up for what they are, even if they try to disguise their Jew-hatred” and “abject nonsense that has no place in public life”. We are extremely grateful to Baroness Deech, Bob Blackman MP, Matthew Offord MP and Mike Freer MP, all of whom rushed to defend our work.

At Campaign Against Antisemitism, we have experience in combating the many variants of antisemitism of both far-right and far-left. They are united by certain constants, for example a well-worn belief that when Jews complain about antisemitism, they are lying to cover up some other hidden motive in order to further ‘Jewish power’. In this case, we have been challenged by an antisemitism of the far-left which indulges the discredited historical distortion that Hitler in some way supported Zionism. The arguments involved are arcane, but most Britons are now familiar with the derision with which that assertion was met by expert historical opinion when articulated by Ken Livingstone, especially when he owned up to basing his statements entirely on his reading of a single notorious book by a journalist called Brenner decades earlier. Livingstone was later forced to admit that Brenner himself was an antisemite, and that his work was badly flawed.

Brenner’s intent was to somehow historically decontextualise Zionism, paint a particular group of Zionists of the 1930s and 1940s as fascistic co-travellers with Hitler, and by association paint all Jews associated with the creation of the Jewish State — then and now — as alien fascists, acting at the expense of ‘real Jews’. This bizarre and long-discredited distortion of history is an attack on the Jewish community of this country: it attempts to diminish Hitler’s responsibility for the Holocaust, shifts that blame on to Jews, and by demonising Zionism as a fascistic movement and contemporary Israel in the same breath, it attempts to coerce British Jews into choosing between being labelled as ‘good Jews’ by rejecting Israel or being labelled as ‘bad Jews’ by supporting it. This means of classification is hurtful, insulting and a completely false and distorted version of history.

Even Jon Lansman, the leader of Momentum, has now called out this false distinction between Zionists and Jews. He knows that the overwhelming majority of Jews of all political persuasions support the existence of Israel. However, none of this prevented Mr Greenstein from writing that “Ken Livingstone got it right”. Mr Greenstein regularly returns to this theme in his blog, and never misses an opportunity to abuse others who debunk his ideas, by characterising them as “Zionist scum”. By backing Ken Livingstone’s Nazi apologism in saying Hitler “supported Zionism, before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews.” Mr Greenstein is to be squarely defined as an antisemite under the International Definition of Antisemitism, which states that “Denying the…intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany…during World War II” is antisemitic.

Mr Greenstein is to be classified as an antisemite on other grounds too. He openly and readily admits to Holocaust inversion (calling Jews Nazis). This breaches the International Definition of Antisemitism by “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”

Mr Greenstein regularly characterises the creation of Israel as “racist,” which is also in breach of the International Definition of Antisemitism by “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour)”. To boot, on his blogs he claims that Jews inflate the Holocaust in order to defend Israel, writing: “The holocaust has…been the alibi for every atrocity of the Israeli state.” However, under the definition: “Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust” is antisemitic.

On all these counts, and more, Tony Greenstein is also guilty under the International Definition of Antisemitism of “Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews”.

Mr Greenstein, unsurprisingly then, has been previously expelled from the Labour Party, silently readmitted (as many antisemites were when Jeremy Corbyn became leader) and then, when publicly exposed, re-suspended by the Party, where he remains alongside other Labour antisemites against whom the Labour Party refuses to act, safe behind the cloak of anonymity afforded by Shami Chakrabarti’s whitewash report on antisemitism.

Mr Greenstein may be known also for the company he keeps: often appearing supporting Jackie Walker, who has also (twice) suspended by the Labour Party for antisemitism. Ms Walker’s antisemitism is well known, and Mr Greenstein embraces her as a colleague and friend, as does Jeremy Corbyn. Tony Greenstein is also allied with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign — an organisation which our recent investigation shows to be a viper’s nest of antisemitism — recently speaking with Jackie Walker at the Brighton and Hove branch.

Mr Greenstein is not above lying. In letters to The Guardian he has stated that the International Definition of Antisemitism prevents criticism of Israel, when, in fact, it explicitly states that it does not, confirming that: “criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic.” He has claimed that Campaign Against Antisemitism is a lobby group acting on behalf of the Israeli government, a ridiculous allegation that would not stand up to any examination or audit. In this context, then, it is entirely relevant to mention that Mr Greenstein has previous criminal form for brazen deception, having past convictions for credit card theft and subsequent use, vandalism, drug possession and a number of other petty crimes. He also appears to also be a misogynist, for example saying about a woman who challenges him  “I suspect when [you] drop your knickers everyone runs away”.

All antisemites have to maintain a level of denial and self-deception. Without it, their beliefs cannot bear contact with the light. Mr Greenstein is no exception —  for him, in order to prove to himself that our own charity is “a McCarthyite Zionist propaganda organisation whose aim is to smear and libel opponents of Israel’s apartheid regime”,  he has had to deny reality by brazenly lying to the Charity Commission, claiming that Campaign Against Antisemitism is “…a nakedly right-wing political Zionist organisation” that is not concerned with “fascist groups, who are antisemitic Holocaust deniers.” When Mr Greenstein’s charges arrive on the desk of the Charity Commission, this will no doubt raise eyebrows, as it is well known that challenging fascist neo-Nazis is a primary focus of our work, and has been since our campaign was founded. We can only imagine the mental somersaults he has had to turn in order to avoid acknowledging this, but he must, for if he acknowledged our fight against fascists and Holocaust deniers, his whole thesis would collapse.

Perhaps he would like to come to court in March, to see members of our organisation and pro bono lawyers — who have suffered violent threats and intimidation — unflinchingly challenge alleged neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers, and witness a private prosecution we have brought against a reluctant Crown Prosecution Service, which has refused to prosecute open-and-shut cases of fascist antisemitism. There, in the public gallery, he will (if previous hearings are a guide) rub shoulders with some of Europe’s foremost Holocaust deniers — or even Gilad Atzmon — who have made the same charge as Mr Greenstein: that Campaign Against Antisemitism is the hidden hand of a ‘Zionist’ conspiracy to repress free speech.

Mr Greenstein and those neo-Nazis are nothing more than two sides of the same antisemitic coin, and we will continue to challenge them both.

As Baroness Tonge denounced Campaign Against Antisemitism in the Daily Mail, MPs and peers contacted the paper to defend us and our work, despite tight press deadlines meaning that they only had one hour on a Friday afternoon in which to do so.

Baroness Tonge had put her name to a petition by antisemitic criminal Tony Greenstein calling for Campaign Against Antisemitism to be shut down as a charity on the basis that we are supposedly a front for the Israeli government, prompting an outpouring of support for our work from her parliamentary colleagues.

Baroness Deech DBE told the Daily Mail: “It is a sad comment on the rise of hate speech in the UK today that anyone would wish to close down a leading organisation dedicated to fighting the oldest hatred of all. It is no coincidence that the protesters have themselves, at various stages, been accused of antisemitism. Antisemitism comes both from the extreme right and the extreme left — and from that point where the two extremes meet — and the CAA has done a good job of making antisemitism unacceptable. The protesters are conflating Judaism and Zionism by claiming that hate speech against Israel and Zionists is merely political. They should be aware, as I am sure the Charity Commission is, that there is a clear line to be drawn between (acceptable) political criticism of Israel’s government, and on the other side of the line, antisemitic statements going far beyond that. The government’s definition of antisemitism, (which is the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance one) which has recently been disseminated to universities, makes that clear.

“The petition to the Charity Commission is absurd, and is perhaps motivated by fear, but it demonstrates just how effective the Campaign Against Antisemitism has been in its relatively short existence. Antisemitism is spreading across continental Europe and has infected social media. The CAA deserves every support and we need real antisemites to be shown up for what they are, even if they try to disguise their Jew-hatred as attacks on Israel, and on self determination for the Jewish people.”

Bob Blackman MP commented: “This web page is just the sort of abject nonsense that has got no place in public life. The CAA and other groups are doing a first-class job of identifying antisemitism. This sounds to me to be an attempt to stifle those who are speaking out against it.”

Mike Freer MP added: “This is a ridiculous attempt to close down an organisation fighting antisemitism, which is on the increase. I have never found the group trying to stifle legitimate comment on Israel but the CAA are vigilant in exposing antisemitism that dresses itself up as anti-Israel comment. If Tonge et al are confident they are not being antisemitic then they have nothing to fear. Trying to close down a legitimate organisation suggests they do!”

Dr Matthew Offord MP said: “This petition is most concerning as the Campaign Against Antisemitism is an important charity that works tirelessly to raise awareness of anti-Jewish racism across the UK. The rise in antisemitic sentiment on the left in the past year is extremely disturbing to myself and many of my constituents. Once again we appear to see the opponents of the state of Israel conflating their opposition to a country with those of the Jewish faith. Whilst criticism of a government’s policies is one thing, we must not allow that to spread into hatred of Judaism. This is why the Campaign Against Antisemitism is currently so vital.”

We are extremely grateful to Baroness Deech, Bob Blackman MP, Mike Freer MP and Dr Matthew Offord MP for their staunch support, and for responding so quickly to nip Baroness Tonge and Tony Greenstein’s disingenuous campaign in the bud.

Neo-Nazi antisemite Sean Creighton, 45, of Enfield, has been jailed for five years following an investigation by the Metropolitan Police Service’s Counter Terrorism Command. This sentence will send a clear message of deterrence to antisemites.

Creighton said that Adolf Hitler was “God”, posed with a rifle in front of a Nazi flag and had a huge swastika tattooed on his chest. Following a search of his home, Creighton was found to be in possession of the White Resistance Manual 2.4, which police described as the kind of document likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism. The manual states that it explains “How to select or fabricate weapons useful in an armed struggle, how to manufacture, handle and employ explosives as part of an armed struggle, how to conduct a guerrilla campaign and how to select targets according to their value to our movement.”

Creighton, a member of the far-right National Front, was sentenced on Thursday to four years’ imprisonment for seven offences of incitement to racial hatred, and five years’ imprisonment for a terrorism offence, to run concurrently. He was also made subject to a notification order for 15 years.

Prosecutor Jonathan Sandiford told Kingston Crown Court: “The defendant was a committed racist, a member of the National Front. He was enthralled by Nazism and Adolf Hitler whom he told police in his interviews was his God.”

Katy Thorne, defending Creighton, said he was “ashamed” and “admitted his views are odious and horrific to the vast majority of society.”

One of Crieghton’s social media posts said “You will never catch me shedding a tear for a n****r, Jew, commie or queer.” One image he posted showed “a number of trees, from each of which is hung one or more Jewish people with the word ‘Jew’ placed upon them by way of a sign.” Creighton used Russian social network VK because it allowed him to “post what he liked” after Facebook, which he called “Jewbook,” blocked him more than 300 times, the court heard.

Last week, Campaign Against Antisemitism submitted evidence to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee about the growth of online antisemitism and the challenge it presents, and we proposed a robust plan for dealing with it.

Following the release of our Bigots for Palestine report, which found rampant antisemitism on the Facebook page of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), PSC has improved the moderation of its Facebook page, but our questions about institutional Jew-hatred at the organisation have deepened.

Last week, our Online Monitoring Unit identified up 17 antisemitic comments on PSC’s Facebook page. All were removed by PSC within a reasonable timescale and this, unquestionably, is progress. But simultaneously, a troubling new report emerged during this week which provides direct evidence of active antisemitism within the PSC leadership itself.

A painstaking and unequivocal report by David Collier describes members of PSC’s leadership posting Jewish power conspiracy theories. Collier also documents “Rabid conspiracy theory, global Zionist control, rabid antisemitism, numerous links to neo-Nazi sites, right-wing fascist think tanks and of course Holocaust denial” shared amongst PSC supporters.

As we said last week, PSC should not settle for cleaning up its Facebook page but should now turn its attention to cleaning up its movement, starting with the roadshow of lectures by antisemite Jackie Walker, who proposes to explain how “false antisemitism allegations silence the Palestinian voice”.

The University of Exeter has ruled that an event by Exeter Friends of Palestine Society must not proceed over fears of “antisemitism or other forms of unlawful discrimination or harassment”. It is the latest university to ban an event for ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ on grounds of antisemitism.

Exeter Friends of Palestine was informed by the university that for the first time in its history it would be issuing a mandatory ban on the event, which consisted of a piece of ‘street theatre’. Whilst the Students’ Guild authorised the event, the university overruled it on “safety and security” grounds, including the risk of “compulsion” which could be interpreted as a loose term for intimidation. When Exeter Friends of Palestine Society appealed the decision, the university’s Provost, Professor Janice Kay wrote to them: “I have been asked to hear your appeal and do not find grounds to accept it.”

The move follows the adoption of the International Definition of Antisemitism by the government following a sustained campaign by Campaign Against Antisemitism, Sir Eric Pickles and others. Minister of State for Universities, Jo Johnson MP, wrote to Universities UK earlier this month asking that all universities be conscious of the definition as ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ approached. Earlier this week the University of Central Lancashire became the first to ban an ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ event, setting an important precedent.

The decision came as Campaign Against Antisemitism released urgent guidance to students dealing with antisemitic incidents during ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’. Students with questions are very welcome to contact our specialist team by e-mailing [email protected].

This news is particularly welcome relief after a spate of antisemitic incidents at the University of Exeter. Last week the university tried to brush off an antisemitic incident in which a “Rights for Whites” sign was found in halls of residence and a swastika was found carved into a door in on-campus halls Birks Grange, with a spokesman downplaying this blatant antisemitic incident as possibly merely “an ill-judged, deeply offensive joke.” This follows another alarming antisemitic incident at the university last term in which students were photographed at a sports club social event wearing t-shirts with handwritten antisemitic slogans. One t-shirt bore the slogan: “the Holocaust was a good time.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism also exposed the antisemitism of Exeter Students’ Guild’s Vice President and trustee, Malaka Shwaikh, who had tweeted that she was “proud to be called terrorist” as well as various tweets comparing Zionism to Nazism, including: “Zionism ideology is no different than that of Hitler’s”. When her support for terrorism and her antisemitism were exposed, Shwaikh deleted her tweets and berated those “attacking” her as simply venting their “Islamophobic” prejudice. We are making a disciplinary complaint to the university, along with a complaint to the Charity Commission.

Every year at universities, ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’ sees a flurry of antisemitic speakers and demonstrations on British campuses. Each year, we are contacted by Jewish students who are unsure of their rights, what they can do, and how we can help them.

This year looks like it will be different.

Following a great deal of work by Campaign Against Antisemitism, Sir Eric Pickles and others, the British government became the first in the world to formally adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism.

The Minister of State for Universities has reminded all universities of the definition and their obligation to protect their Jewish students, already resulting in the University of Central Lancashire declaring that an Israeli Apartheid Week event would not be lawful.

We are now expecting further announcements from other universities, but some universities, for example SOAS, are stubbornly refusing to enforce the International Definition of Antisemitism, and are allowing antisemitism on their campuses under the guise of ‘academic freedom’.

Universities and students’ unions are governed by complex rules and laws, including the government’s Prevent counter-extremism strategy, the public sector equality duty, charity law and numerous other requirements. It can be complicated to enforce the law, but we are here to help. Today we are releasing a simple guide for students to their rights, and ways that they can help. The guide is being sent to Jewish Societies directly and can be downloaded by anybody from our website.

The tide is turning. Antisemitism on university campuses is at long last being exposed and rejected.

Lord Nick Bourne, the Minister for Faith and Integration, has announced a government grant of £50,000 to Stamford Hill Shomrim, the Jewish neighbourhood watch patrol, to improve the reporting of antisemitic hate crime. Lord Bourne, a steadfast friend of the Jewish community, visited Shomrim and the charedi community in Stamford Hill to make this important announcement and to demonstrate his appreciation for Shomrim’s work. We applaud his strong commitment to fighting antisemitism.

This additional funding is particularly timely in light of the continuing antisemitic attacks on the charedi community. Charedi Jews are particularly recognisable and therefore are frequently victimised by antisemites. They are also rendered easy targets as during Jewish festivals and the sabbath, the only way for them to contact the police is to find a police officer.

The lack of attention to the charedi community led us to recommend to the Home Office that direct engagement with the charedi community over antisemitic crime should be made a priority, which the Home Office accepted and included in the government’s Hate Crime Action Plan.

Last year, a crime recording drive by Shomrim revealed horrifyingly-common antisemitic crime targeting charedi Jews, ranging from schoolchildren being attacked to women being chased through the streets, all motivated by antisemitism clearly expressed by the attackers. Sadly, the crime recording drive was too taxing on Shomrim’s resources and had to stop, but with this much-needed new grant, Shomrim will be much better resourced to combat antisemitism and to measure the true extent of antisemitic hate crime.

Over the years, Shomrim have emerged as the gold standard in community policing. Working closely with local officers from the Metropolitan Police Service, Shomrim’s volunteers patrol non-stop, frequently apprehending antisemitic criminals as well as thieves, vandals and other criminals, resulting in an appreciable fall in overall crime in the areas in which they operate. Greatly appreciated by the local community, both Jewish and non-Jewish, Shomrim also provide valuable services, such as helping to locate people who go missing, many of whom are vulnerable and need to be found extremely fast. Having won the praise of outgoing Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, Shormim has emerged as a template for engaging with local communities and creating a truly effective neighbourhood watch scheme.

We greatly admire Shomrim and the valuable work they do protecting the Jewish community and the general public, and we commend Lord Bourne for his firm support for Shomrim’s work.

Friends of Palestine societies from Kings College London, the University of Manchester and the University of Sussex are rolling out the red carpet to for a roadshow event organised as part of ‘Israeli Apartheid Week’. The lectures, billed as “Palestine: 100 Years of Settler-Colonialism. 100 Years of Popular Struggle for Justice”, will be held in London on 28th February, Manchester on 1st March and Sussex on 2nd March.

Campaign Against Antisemitism calls on the universities to cancel these events following the precedent set by the University of Central Lancashire, which cancelled an ‘Israel Apartheid Week’ event for contravening the International Definition of Antisemitism adopted by the British Government.

The event description invites students to “Join campaigners in the Movement for Black Lives in the United States, South Africa and the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement for a discussion on the Palestinian struggle for justice. The Palesitnian [sic] people have been struggling against settler-colonialism for 100 years. How can we support their struggle for liberation and build powerful movements against racism and oppression?” This makes it very clear that the event is not only opposed to particular Israeli policies such as the construction of settlements, but to the existence of the state of Israel, which will celebrate its 69th birthday this year, within any borders. Under the International Definition of Antisemitism, it is antisemitic to seek the destruction of Israel or claim that its creation was a racist endeavour.

The speakers at all three events are deeply concerning. Aja Monet, described as a “poet and activist with Dream Defenders, part of the broader Movement for Black Lives” tweeted on 23rd August 2011: “@mikeschreiber lol…lies. you jews and your lies.” The tweet she appears to have been responding to has been deleted or hidden.

Another speaker, Farid Esack, described as a “South African activist and Muslim liberation theologian” was recently condemned by the Israeli Embassy in Germany following his controversial appointment to a German University. An Embassy spokesman said of Esack: “This is a man who expressed antisemitic statements, and who is sympathetic to Holocaust denial. A person with such views has no place as an educator in a university, in particular not in Germany; due to both professional as well as moral and probably also legal reasons.” He was also barred from speaking at an ‘Israel Apartheid Week’ event at the Pantheon-Sorbonne University in France in 2015 after complaints were received by the institution. In 2015, he hosted a fundraising dinner for his “comrade” Leila Khaled, the convicted Palestinian terrorist, plane hijacker and member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine politburo.

We are contacting all three universities following requests from a number of students.

Kristian Omilian, 30, has been sentenced to a 12-month community order for sticking antisemitic stickers on a synagogue in Auckland Road, Cambridge. He was caught on CCTV in November 2016.

On 9th February, he pleaded guilty to a racially and religiously aggravated public order offence. He was handed a restraining order at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court which prevents him from stepping within 100 yards of the synagogues in Thompsons Lane and Auckland Road and he must participate in up to 15 days of rehabilitation activity and undertake 120 hours of unpaid work.

This comes in the wake of other antisemitic incidents at the University of Cambridge in the last few months. Earlier this month, up to 30 antisemitic leaflets which supported claims made by convicted Holocaust denier David Irving, were pinned to cars parked on Sidgwick Avenue. Two swastikas had been drawn on a map on Jesus Green and antisemitic posters were placed in Christ’s College. In November last year, three Jewish students were assaulted in an antisemitic attack but the university refused to reveal the outcome of its investigations to the victims. In a statement, Professor Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, the Vice-Chancellor of the university, said: “The recent commemoration of International Holocaust Remembrance Day should remind us all of the horrors of racism and all acts of hatred and aggression against any religious or racial group. I strongly condemn the distribution of Holocaust denial leaflets across the University and elsewhere.”

A precedent has been set. The University of Central Lancashire has cancelled an event which was scheduled for the nationwide “Israel Apartheid Week”. The cancelled session titled “Debunking Misconceptions on Palestine” was organised by the university’s Friends of Palestine Society and was promoted as a panel discussion promoting a boycott of Israel. In the past, “Israel Apartheid Week” has seen a range of antisemitic abuse, demonstrations and speaker events.

In a powerful statement on behalf of the university, a spokesperson said that the event contravened the International Definition of Antisemitism which has been adopted by the British Government. He said: “We believe the proposed talk contravenes the new definition and furthermore breaches university protocols for such events, where we require assurances of a balanced view or a panel of speakers representing all interests. In this instance our procedures determined that the proposed event would not be lawful and therefore it will not proceed as planned.”

The decision appears to follow a letter sent by Jo Johnson MP, Minister of State for Universities, to Nicola Dandridge, Chief Executive of Universities UK. In the letter he asks her to “disseminate this [definition] in your institution so that this position is widely known and clearly understood.” He ended: “This Government will diligently pursue our commitment to tackle intolerance and bigotry in every form”.

Campaign Against Antisemitism is very encouraged by this positive development and we commend the University of Central Lancashire for its principled response, as well as the many members of the public and activist groups who wrote to the university about this event.

Significantly, universities often allow unsavoury events within their premises on the basis that they are organised by students’ unions, which are not under the control of the university. Such a stance is at odds with the law which places obligations on universities to control the use of their premises in accordance with the government’s counter-extremism strategy. It is absolutely right that universities should now use the definition of antisemitism adopted by the British government and the College of Policing, and enforce it on any organisation or body seeking to use their premises.

In particular, this decision makes the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) look foolish following our revelation last week that its Director refuses to even consider adopting the International Definition of Antisemitism. We will not be dropping the matter.

We are extremely keen to hear from students who are experiencing antisemitism on campus, or who are aware of upcoming events of concern via e-mail at [email protected].

Norfolk Constabulary has arrested five youths after workers found swastikas and an offensive antisemitic message spray-painted on walls near the post office at Long Stratton Shopping Centre.

In a statement, Norfolk Constabulary confirmed: “Five youths, four males and one female aged between 13 and 16 years old, have been arrested in connection with the incident. They have since been release on police bail pending further enquiries until April. Anyone who may have information about the incident should contact PC Chris Shelley at Diss Police Station on 101.”

Brandon Drewry, who works in One Stop convenience store, told local media that “They have sprayed our windows and cameras and we haven’t been able to clear it up as we’re waiting for a bill on the costs. It has angered me a lot, I have been here for six years and haven’t seen anything like it. It reflects the area in a bad way.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism welcomes the speedy response from the police and will be following the case with interest.

Ray Kiddell, a council member for 37 years on football’s governing body, the Football Association (FA), made a very disturbing comment during an interview on BBC Radio 5 Live about reform within the game in England following scrutiny after the House of Commons passed a “no confidence” motion in the FA to reform itself, with specific criticism that its board fails to represent the diversity of the game.

Kiddell responded: “As far as ethnic minorities are concerned, we have problems, we’ve got to think ‘who are the ethnic minorities?’ At the moment we’ve got a Buddhist and a Muslim on the council. Now who else do we put on the council, a Jew.”

Kick It Out, an anti-racism campaign which fights bigotry within football and the Football Supporters’ Federation, FSF, released a joint statement on their websites condemning Kiddell’s “unhelpful comment”. They said they were “dismayed” by the remarks and complained to the FA. Kick it Out posted a disappointing and toothless response from an FA spokesperson on their website distancing itself from the comments: “His comments in this interview are completely at odds with the views of the FA and we will address this matter internally.”

But Kick It Out should also focus on putting its own house in order. Earlier this month, Lord Ouseley, the Chairman of Kick It Out, co-signed a letter to The Guardian calling for the Labour Party to readmit Marc Wadsworth, a Labour activist who was suspended by the Party for his actions at the launch of Baroness Chakrabarti’s whitewash report into antisemitism in the Party. With Jeremy Corbyn and Baroness Chakrabarti looking on inertly, Wadsworth stood to harangue Ruth Smeeth, a Labour MP who is Jewish, of conspiring with the media. Smeeth left the event in tears and called on Jeremy Corbyn to resign.

Dr Rebecca Gould, a lecturer at the University of Bristol, has been caught red-handed having written a sickening article about antisemitism. We first reported on 12th February that an anonymous student at Bristol had written to their student newspaper, The Epigram, alleging that a lecturer had penned a disturbing article about antisemitism and the Holocaust, but the student chose to keep the identity of the lecturer and the article itself confidential, even when we approached them through The Epigram.

Following an appeal for information, we are in a position to reveal the lecturer and the article.

Dr Rebecca Gould’s article titled “Beyond Antisemitism” was published in the radical left wing Counter Punch magazine edition of November 2011. Dr Gould wrote: “Defining the Shoah vis-a-vis the Greek (and, incidentally, Christian) term for a sacrifice to G-d has helped make it available to manipulation by governmental elites, aiming to promote the narrative most likely to underwrite their claims to sovereignty. Claiming the Holocaust as a holy event sanctifies the state of Israel and whitewashes its crimes.” She added: “perhaps the time has come to stop privileging the Holocaust as the central event in Jewish history.” She concluded the article: “As the situation stands today, the Holocaust persists and its primary victims are the Palestinian people.”

According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic. Additionally, according to the expert legal opinion commissioned by Campaign Against Antisemitism, contending that either Jews, Israel or the West have “manipulated” the Holocaust to generate sympathy for Jews or for Israel or prevent criticism of them is an allegation “chosen to be emotive and upsetting to Jewish people and to generate hostility towards them.”

The article appeared on various websites but it has been deleted everywhere, except for one website which offered a PDF download.

According to the University of Bristol School of Modern Languages website, the lecturer has a PhD from Columbia University and is a Reader in Translation Studies & Comparative Literature. She taught previously at New York University, Columbia University, and Yale-NUS College in Singapore and specialises in the literatures of the Persian and Islamic world (especially the Caucasus). She is “happy to supervise in the areas of Middle Eastern and Central Asian literatures and cultures, translation studies, Islamic studies, comparative literature, critical theory, and modern Iran”.

We wrote to the Vice Chancellor of the University of Bristol to register our formal complaint, demanding that Dr Gould be suspended until she clarifies whether she stands by the article she wrote in 2011. If she does not, she should be required by the university to publicly retract he article, perhaps by writing an article for The Epigram explaining why the views are wrong, and why she has come to renounce them. However, if Dr Gould still holds such views she should be dismissed, and her dismissal should be made public so as to clearly signal the University of Bristol’s values.

The university has since told The Telegraph’s Education Editor, Camilla Turner: “Academic freedom, and freedom of speech, are at the heart of our mission at the University of Bristol. Since receiving a letter from the Campaign Against Antisemitism yesterday we are actively looking into this matter. As it relates to an individual member of staff we are not able to comment further.” Dr Gould told Camilla Turner that she did not retract her views and that her article was a “rallying call to action”.

Dr Gould’s article reveals an obsessive delusion that the Holocaust is being claimed as a “holy event”, that it is improper for Jews to pay it much attention and that now Jews are perpetrating a Holocaust. If Dr Gould stands by her sickening views then the University of Bristol must discipline her. But the University of Bristol’s statement meekly defending “academic freedom” whilst failing to mention the rights of Jewish students leaves us with scant confidence in the adequacy of their response.

A man has pleaded guilty to shouting antisemitic abuse at volunteers from Stamford Hill Shomrim who suspected him of involvement in burglaries. Clive Wilson, 46, admitted shouting: “Shame Hitler didn’t finish the job, Heil Hitler, Heil Hitler, Allahu Akbar”. He had earlier denied the charge. Wilson was fined £160 and made to pay a £30 victim surcharge and £85 in court costs, a meagre sentence which will do nothing at all to deter antisemitic crime.

In December, his accomplice, Vandell Brooks, 39, who has a history of racismpleaded guilty to shouting: “F***ing Jewish c***” at the Shomrim volunteers as she was loaded into a police van. She was fined £200, plus a £30 victim surcharge and £85 in court costs. Astonishingly, Wilson who initially did not plead guilty has received an even lower fine than his accomplice who pleaded guilty two months ago.

The incident took place on 13th December when volunteers from Stamford Hill Shomrim were on a routine foot patrol. They noticed a man and a woman whom they suspected might be linked to a spate of recent burglaries. The Shomrim volunteers immediately called the Metropolitan Police Service, which arrested the pair.

During the arrest, the Wilson looked at the Shomrim volunteers, who are charedi Jews, and said: “Funny-looking f***ers” at which point the police officers warned him that he would be committing a criminal offence if he continued. He then shouted: “Shame Hitler didn’t finish the job, Heil Hitler, Heil Hitler, Allahu Akbar”.

We commend Stamford Hill Shomrim for their valuable work on behalf of all residents of the area, and we applaud the officers involved for their firm stance against antisemitism.

We are disappointed by the sentence. Lenient sentencing emboldens offenders instead of deterring them, and both Brooks and Wilson have received a mere slap on the wrist.

https://twitter.com/Shomrim/status/833714817408040966

https://twitter.com/baz_j/status/833781352688402432

After a spate of antisemitic incidents at the University of Exeter, students decided to organise a protest march. They did what came naturally to them and asked Malaka Shwaikh, exposed by Campaign Against Antisemitism as a terrorist-supporting antisemite, to address the crowd and make Jewish students feel safe. Whilst professing an admirable desire for solidarity, Shwaikh took the opportunity not to renounce any of her views and to instead berate those “attacking” her as simply venting their “Islamophobic” prejudice.

Over the past week, Campaign Against Antisemitism has received dozens of tweets and Facebook posts from Exeter students and alumni, including:

  • Shwaikh tweeted in 2015: “If terrorism means protecting and defending my land, I am so proud to be called terrorist. What an honour for the Palestinians!”
  • Shwaikh marked Holocaust Memorial Day, by tweeting that “The shadow of the Holocaust continues to fall over us from the continuous Israeli occupation of Palestine to the election of Trump”.
  • Shwaikh has claimed that “Zionism ideology is no different than that of Hitler’s” and she has also written that “Hitler did his deed and the Palestinians had to pay for it.”

According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic, as is expressing support for genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisations proscribed by the British government, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad, but that did not stop Exeter’s students from electing her as Vice President of the University of Exeter’s Students’ Guild. In her manifesto she claimed that she has spent her life “aiming to change our society for the better and help to spread justice and fairness everywhere”, but despite her efforts to delete her tweets, her Twitter account tells a different story. She is already a trustee of the Students’ Guild.

We have also found that Shwaikh received the glowing endorsement of Malia Bouattia, the President of the National Union of Students. Bouattia praised Shwaikh’s “commitment for justice” and her “record on international peace and justice”. In return, Shwaikh called Bouattia “amazing”. In a leaked report over the weekend, Bouattia was found for the second time by NUS to have made antisemitic comments, but the report recommended that she face no consequences for her actions.

Last week the university tried to brush off an antisemitic incident in which a “Rights for Whites” sign was found in halls of residence and a swastika was found carved into a door in on-campus halls Birks Grange, with a spokesman downplaying this blatant antisemitic incident as possibly merely “an ill-judged, deeply offensive joke.” This follows another alarming antisemitic incident at the university last term in which students were photographed at a sports club social event wearing t-shirts with handwritten antisemitic slogans. One t-shirt bore the slogan: “the Holocaust was a good time.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism is closely monitoring the response to this latest disturbing outbreak of antisemitism. We would be interested to hear from students by e-mail at [email protected].

It is clear that Malaka Shwaikh has breached the University of Exeter’s disciplinary code for staff and students. We understand that she both studies and teaches at the university. Additionally she is a trustee of the Students’ Guild, which places her under obligations incumbent upon all trustees of charities under British law. Furthermore the university has obligations under the government’s Prevent counter-extremism strategy. And naturally she can be held accountable for any crimes she has committed. We will be pursuing all of these avenues until we are satisfied that the University of Exeter and the Students’ Guild have dealt exhaustively with this matter and done all that is necessary to protect their students.

Disgracefully, the University of Exeter has told Campaign Against Antisemitism that it “cannot comment on individual cases.” We are not so easily deterred.

Precious Life, an anti-abortion campaigning group in Northern Ireland, has compared advocating for a woman’s right to choose an abortion on medical grounds to Adolf Hitler’s eugenics programme which saw disabled people and other undesired members of society, including Jews, murdered by doctors.

The debate over abortion should be had without such cheap shots which diminish the Holocaust in what might be called ‘softcore’ Holocaust denial. Adolf Hitler was not a pro-choice campaigner, he was the ultimate author of the Holocaust. Precious Life ought to be ashamed of itself.

A threatening antisemitic message and image have been sent to the Jewish community in Belfast, Northern Ireland, via the community’s Facebook page. The community subsequently posted a heartfelt message on Facebook that “Until further notice we cannot put up times, dates and locations of events to do with the Belfast Jewish Community.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism has contacted the community about this incident.

Rabbi David Singer, the Rabbi of the Belfast Jewish community, has confirmed to local media that the matter has been reported to police and that is being treated as a hate crime. The community has reported receiving “overwhelming” support from the public following the incident.

A police spokeswoman said that “Police have received a complaint regarding abusive messages posted on social media” and “Enquiries are continuing into the matter.”

In August last year, 13 Jewish graves were damaged in an antisemitic attack at Belfast City Cemetery. No arrests have been made in connection with the vandalism.

Belfast’s Jewish community has been dwindling for a number of years. According to the last census in 2011, only 335 Jews remain in the whole of Northern Ireland.

We have met with the Director of the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), Baroness Amos. The meeting did not go well.

On 8th February, Campaign Against Antisemitism met with Baroness Amos, along with SOAS’s Registrar, Paula Sanderson, and its Secretary, Dr Chris Ince. While Baroness Amos recognised that the School has “a lot of work to do” to make Jewish students feel welcome on her campus, she balked when asked to accept the International Definition of Antisemitism adopted by the British government. She said that she would do “whatever is necessary to make Jewish students feel safe”, but not that.

We pointed out that SOAS has a particular problem with antisemitism, and that the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee had recommended the adoption of the International Definition. Baroness Amos countered that no law had been passed. We pointed out that the Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education had censured Sheffield Hallam University for failing to consider adopting the definition. She told us that SOAS cannot adopt a definition as it is bound by the Equality Act. We pointed out that the government and the College of Policing and countless other bodies are also bound by the same Act, but they had adopted the definition.

Baroness Amos said that she would welcome a debate on campus about a definition of antisemitism but that it was a contentious issue, it “would take five years” to actually adopt any definition, and it would be an exercise in “navel gazing”. Just hours after we met with Baroness Amos, the London Assembly became the latest body to unanimously adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism following a very straightforward vote.

It is an established principle that you cannot address a problem until you have identified what it is, and adopted criteria, in this case a definition of antisemitism. That Baroness Amos refuses to even consider SOAS adopting the International Definition of Antisemitism for its disciplinary proceedings tells us all that we need to know about how serious SOAS is about addressing its antisemitism problem.

SOAS has long been nicknamed “The School of Antisemitism” for its long history of victimising Jewish students. Baroness Deech recently declared it a university Jewish students “should avoid” and Campaign Against Antisemitism has lodged complaints with SOAS and the Charity Commission over an antisemitic lecture. SOAS Palestine Society recently proposed to define what Jewish students could take offence to and Jewish students have been threatened, as detailed in a hard-hitting Evening Standard exposé last month. When the Jewish Society took their complaint to SOAS Students’ Union last month, they were stripped of their right to define what they find antisemitic.

Instead of taking the principal action requested by Campaign Against Antisemitism and students, SOAS has promised to review its Respect Policy, improve awareness of its Respect Policy, discuss equality with SOAS Students’ Union, and ensure that campus security liaises better with the Community Security Trust about safety at contentious events. In other words, they will do as little as possible, short of doing nothing at all.

It is intolerable that in 2017, in Britain’s capital, Jewish students are being victimised and their university is refusing to begin to act by accepting the International Definition of Antisemitism as used by the government and the College of Policing.

What happens next must be left up to the students who are affected by this situation. They may wish to continue negotiating with Baroness Amos, they may wish to explore official complaints and litigation, and they may wish to protest. We have offered our full support and resources to help the students with any negotiations, litigation or demonstration that they would like us to help them to pursue.

John Clarke, a Labour Councillor and Chairman of Black Notley Parish Council in Essex, who was a parliamentary candidate for Labour in 2015, has tendered his resignation as a councillor after Campaign Against Antisemitism exposed him as a vicious and vile antisemite and instigated disciplinary proceedings with the District Council.

Mr Clarke had written a comment on Facebook berating Holocaust victims for ‘not fighting back’ and tweeted an image claiming that the Rothschild family, a Jewish family of bankers and philanthropists, has “used usury alongside modern Israel as an imperial instrument to take over the world and all of its resources, including you and I”. The image was clearly from antisemitic conspiracy myth website Smoloko and was first tweeted by an account whose biography proclaims that “Hitler was right”. Mr Clarke felt that the image represented “an oversimplified view of the world economy but containing a great deal of truth.” When challenged by other Twitter users, he retorted: “Antisemite smear in constant overuse as those who use it expand their power base”. It is not hard to imagine who he is referring to.

Campaign Against Antisemitism then learned from one of Mr Clarke’s former pupils that in a Facebook rant in 2012 he had written: “As for WW2, I am unaware of any significant military action taken by Jews against Nazi Germany; ask older Jews why they didn’t actually FIGHT the nazis. In addition, insulting the memory of the allied forces, which included many of my relatives, who actually freed Jews from concentration camps you are the ‘deniers’ here. You may also like to know that many British ex-soldiers now in their eighties remember what the Jews did to members of the British forces sent to keep the peace in Israel, before it was declared a sovereign state in the late 1940s. I’ll bet you have an excuse for THAT disgusting bit of Jewish history”. Despite being an unarmed civilian population facing the might of Nazi Germany’s genocidal forces, Jews famously did mount fierce rebellions and missions to sabotage or resist the Nazis.”

Unfortunately, such views appear to be quite common within the increasingly racist Labour Party, which has been secretly readmitting members who were suspended over antisemitism. The Labour Party has not uttered a single word since we exposed Mr Clarke.

We have repeatedly stated that we do not consider the Labour Party to be safe for Jews. Sadly for many in Labour, including Mr Clarke, accusations of antisemitism are like water off a duck’s back, or worse, a badge of honour.

In response to our Bigots for Palestine report, which found rampant antisemitism on the Facebook page of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), the PSC issued an evasive statement. Whilst it describes antisemitism as “abhorrent”, we find the statement weak and evasive because:

  • It conflates antisemitism with Islamophobia. Our Online Monitoring Unit found no instances of Islamophobia on PSC’s Facebook page. We therefore question why PSC would link the two.
  • It describes the perpetrators of the posts as “members of the public” rather than recognising that they are the PSC’s supporters, thus apparently externalising the problem.
  • It makes the excuse that PSC’s Facebook page is too busy to moderate effectively, but our report demonstrated that PSC was highly effective at removing other forms of hate speech but chose to allow antisemitism.

The reaction of some PSC supporters to PSC’s statement been antisemitic to the extent that PSC deleted its original statement and then republished it in a new thread. Supporter comments on PSC’s first post (now deleted) alleged that false antisemitism charges were being used by “Israeli agents”, “hasbarists” and “Zionists” as a weapon against them. One commenter posted a virulently antisemitic video entitled “CNN, Goldman Sachs and the Zio Matrix”.

However we do recognise and applaud the fact that PSC’s Facebook page has been much more effectively moderated this week, and the usual antisemitic slurs, conspiracy myths and Holocaust denial are being removed.

PSC should not settle for cleaning up its Facebook page but should now turn its attention to cleaning up its movement. For example, the Brighton and Hove branch of PSC and various branches of PSC in Scotland have scheduled events to explain how “false antisemitism allegations silence the Palestinian voice”, with speakers including Jackie Walker and Tony Greenstein, both of whom were suspended by the Labour Party for antisemitism.

When we published our Bigots for Palestine report, we wrote: “We fully expect that among PSC supporters, this report will be seen as cynical political manipulation, thus further proving our claim that the Pro-Palestine movement is deeply infused with antisemitism.” Sadly and predictably, we have been proven right.

Yesterday Campaign Against Antisemitism exposed Malaka Shwaikh, who is running unopposed as Vice President of the University of Exeter’s Students’ Guild. But whilst Shwaikh busily deleted tweets, we received further reports of antisemitic tweets from Exeter students and alumni, with one heartbreaking e-mail pleading with us: “Please don’t let this person get into a position of power”.

Now we can reveal that Shwaikh tweeted in 2015: “If terrorism means protecting and defending my land, I am so proud to be called terrorist. What an honour for the Palestinians!”

Various organisations from Shwaikh’s native Gaza are genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisations proscribed by the British government, including Hamas and Islamic Jihad.

Shwaikh is about to become Vice President of the Students’ Guild (she is already a trustee) after running unopposed. In her manifesto she claimed that she has spent her life “aiming to change our society for the better and help to spread justice and fairness everywhere”, but her Twitter account tells a different story.

Yesterday, we revealed that Shwaikh marked Holocaust Memorial Day, by tweeting that “The shadow of the Holocaust continues to fall over us from the continuous Israeli occupation of Palestine to the election of Trump”. She has claimed that “Zionism ideology is no different than that of Hitler’s” and she has also written that “Hitler did his deed and the Palestinians had to pay for it.” According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic.

Between yesterday afternoon and this evening, the tweet was deleted along with others that had been reported to us and which were deleted before we could verify them (if you wish to report tweets to us, please always do it via e-mail rather than using Twitter, otherwise you may give the person you are reporting enough notice to cover their tracks before we can verify the tweets).

We have also found that Shwaikh received the glowing endorsement of Malia Bouattia, the President of the National Union of Students. Bouattia praised Shwaikh’s “commitment for justice” and her “record on international peace and justice”. In return, Shwaikh called Bouattia “amazing”. In a leaked report today, Bouattia was found for the second time by NUS to have made antisemitic comments, but the report recommended that she face no consequences for her actions.

Earlier this week the university tried to brush off an antisemitic incident in which a “Rights for Whites” sign was found in halls of residence and a swastika was found carved into a door in on-campus halls Birks Grange, with a spokesman downplaying this blatant antisemitic incident as possibly merely “an ill-judged, deeply offensive joke.” This follows another alarming antisemitic incident at the university last term in which students were photographed at a sports club social event wearing t-shirts with handwritten antisemitic slogans. One t-shirt bore the slogan: “the Holocaust was a good time.”

Last night the University of Exeter tweeted us their response which included a commendable statement by the university’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Sir Steve Smith who said: “It is our personal and collective duty to ensure any incidents of abuse, no matter how rare, are stamped out immediately. We shall continue to ensure that everyone in, or associated with, the University feels safe, supported, accepted and welcomed. As Vice-Chancellor of the University I pledge to do everything I can to make sure that the University lives up to this commitment.”

Regrettably his statement will ring hollow whilst Malaka Shwaikh is Vice President and trustee of the Students’ Guild.

Campaign Against Antisemitism is closely monitoring the response to this latest disturbing outbreak of antisemitism. We would be interested to hear from students by e-mail at [email protected]. We will be writing to the university and the Charity Commission about this latest development.

An internal report for the National Union of Students has found that its President, Malia Bouattia, has made antisemitic comments but must face no action whatsoever as a consequence.

The report is the result of a two-month inquiry launched to ascertain whether Bouattia is an antisemite. Finding that Bouattia made comments that “could be reasonably capable of being interpreted as antisemitic”, the report recommended that no disciplinary action be taken. Instead, Professor Carol Baxter, the NHS’s former equality chief who authored the report, proposed that Bouattia should apologise instead and escape any further consequence.

Professor Baxter wrote that Bouattia had been “genuine in expressing her regret”, had “considered the impact of what she says” and had denounced antisemitism, ruling: “in light of the above mitigating circumstances no further action should be taken within the NUS disciplinary process.”

Bouattia has previously called Birmingham University a “Zionist outpost in higher education” because it has “the largest Jsoc [Jewish student society] in the country.” She has railed against “Zionist-led media outlets”, defended Palestinian terrorism as “resistance” and voted against condemning ISIS. When called on by Campaign Against Antisemitism and countless student leaders to retract her comments, she penned an article in The Guardian claiming that her accusers were simply sexists and racists. Bouattia since refused to confirm that Israel has a right to even exist, and told an audience at the School of Oriental and African Studies that the government’s anti-terrorism strategy is led by “Zionist and neo-con lobbies”. Last July Bouattia drew further condemnation when she used her casting vote to strip Jewish students of their ability to elect their own representative.

Student leaders have gone so far as to write open letters expressing embarrassment and apologising to Jewish students for the actions of Bouattia and the National Union of Students. The Union of Jewish Students has called for her resignation, as have other student groups including Oxford University Students’ Union. The House of Commons Home Affairs Committee’s Inquiry into the Rise of Antisemitism in Britain strongly criticised her.

It had been hoped that the report might redress the situation, but following the leaking of the report to The Telegraph, the report has been branded a “disgrace” and a “Labour-style stitch-up”.

This is the second time that Bouattia has been found to have made antisemitic remarks, the first time being in 2014 whilst she was serving as the salaried Black Students’ Officer.

The report now goes before the board of NUS which may decide to ask her to step down, however the reaction from NUS has been far from contrite with a spokesman trying to dismiss the report as a sexist, Islamophobic media conspiracy: “Malia has addressed the accusations of antisemitism numerous times since her election last year, including in the Sunday Times in April, the Huffington Post in October, and in writing to the 560 NUS-affiliated further and higher education students’ unions in December. The resuscitation of this story in the media is part of a sustained attack on a high-profile Muslim woman in a public position. Her family has been harassed and she is the subject of regular and serious threats. These attacks not only put her personal safety at risk but are part of a dangerous trend that deter under-represented groups from taking part in public life.”

Despite the report being issued to Bouattia several weeks ago, she has made no apology.

Gideon Falter, Chairman of Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “NUS has shown a disregard for Jewish students that is utterly shameful. This is the second time that Malia Bouattia has been found by an NUS inquiry to have made antisemitic remarks, yet NUS plans to do nothing about it. Instead of acting on the concerns of Jewish and non-Jewish student leaders whose allegations even this whitewash inquiry has partially accepted, NUS has disgraced itself further by charging that accusations of antisemitism against Malia Bouattia are simply a sexist, Islamophobic plot. Previously the problem lay squarely with Malia Bouattia, but this is the NUS’s last stand. If the board of NUS takes no action, then the problem is with NUS as a whole.”

Grossly offensive and antisemitic graffiti has been found on park benches next to Kew Pier in the London Borough of Richmond-upon-Thames.

While walking her dog on Sunday 12th February, Drorit Etzioni, a Jewish lady, spotted the antisemitic graffiti and took photos. “Bank of England” surrounded by stars of David was daubed in thick black paint on one bench and “Goyim, Holohoax, Google” on another. She was left shaken by the graffiti. A friend reported the incident to Campaign Against Antisemitism and the police on her behalf so that it can be thoroughly investigated and the graffiti removed. Kew Pier and nearby Kew Gardens are popular spots for young families and tourists.

“Bank of England” is a reference to the antisemitic canard of nefarious Jewish financial influence. Jews are often accused by antisemites and neo-Nazis of exercising supposed financial dominance to hide ‘evidence’ of a Jewish conspiracy, such as a conspiracy to exaggerate or invent the Holocaust. The star of David is the symbol of Jewish identity and Judaism.

“Goyim” means non-Jew or gentile in Yiddish but it has been usurped by neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers as a means of demonstrating Jewish ‘otherness’ and is frequently used to suggest that Jews have a derogatory view of non-Jews. “Holohoax” is a word used by Holocaust-deniers to portray the extermination of six million Jews as a fraud perpetrated by the Jewish people for financial gain. “Google” was probably written to encourage passersby to search the above words online, where the top search results would include Holocaust denial websites.

Anybody with information should call the police on 101.

Four days after the University of Exeter brushed off the latest antisemitic incident, we can reveal that Malaka Shwaikh, is running unopposed as Vice President of the Students’ Guild.

Shwaikh, who is already a trustee of the Students’ Guild, says that she has spent her life “aiming to change our society for the better and help to spread justice and fairness everywhere”, but her Twitter account tells a different story. To mark Holocaust Memorial Day, she tweeted that “The shadow of the Holocaust continues to fall over us from the continuous Israeli occupation of Palestine to the election of Trump”. She has claimed that “Zionism ideology is no different than that of Hitler’s” and she has also written that “Hitler did his deed and the Palestinians had to pay for it.”   According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic.

Earlier this week the university tried to brush off an antisemitic incident in which a “Rights for Whites” sign was found in halls of residence and a swastika was found carved into a door in on-campus halls Birks Grange, with a spokesman downplaying this blatant antisemitic incident as possibly merely “an ill-judged, deeply offensive joke.” This follows another alarming antisemitic incident at the university last term in which students were photographed at a sports club social event wearing t-shirts with handwritten antisemitic slogans. One t-shirt bore the slogan: “the Holocaust was a good time.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism is closely monitoring the response to this latest disturbing outbreak of antisemitism. We would be interested to hear from students by e-mail at [email protected]. We will be writing to the university and the Charity Commission about this latest development.

Archived version

Archived version

Archived version

Archived version

Antisemitism has again reared its ugly head at a British university. The University of Exeter has opened an investigation after a swastika and a “Rights for Whites” sign were found in halls of residence. The swastika had been found carved into a door in on-campus halls Birks Grange.

It is troubling that, already, the university seems to be finding excuses and downplaying this blatant antisemitic incident with a spokesperson saying: “The investigation is ongoing and no conclusions have yet been drawn, but it appears, from initial inquiries, that this may have been an ill-judged, deeply offensive joke on the students’ part, parodying a sketch in a TV comedy show.”

The time for excuses, inertia and cowardice was over long ago. There has to be a zero tolerance approach and the University of Exeter must take immediate robust action.

This follows another alarming antisemitic incident at the university last term in which students were photographed at a sports club social event wearing t-shirts with handwritten antisemitic slogans. One t-shirt bore the slogan: “the Holocaust was a good time.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism is closely monitoring the response to this latest disturbing outbreak of antisemitism. We would be interested to hear from the victims by e-mail at [email protected].

Campaign Against Antisemitism has today submitted its evidence to the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee’s “Policing for the future: changing demands and new challenges” inquiry.

We have set out in detail the challenge presented by online antisemitism, and proposed a robust plan for dealing with it, including:

  • Development of a state-of-the-art monitoring system for online antisemitism, the benefits of which could be applied to the fight against other forms of hate crime;
  • The establishment of a national centre for policing online hate crime and extremism;
  • Enshrining the International Definition of Antisemitism in law so that it can be more easily acted upon by police forces; and
  • Regulation of social networks, and legislation to clarify the civil law remedies available to victims of online hate crime against perpetrators and the social networks themselves.

Our full submission can be viewed online.

A 17-year-old neo-Nazi from Bradford who made a homemade pipe bomb in order to start an “all-out race war” has been sentenced to a mere three-year Youth Rehabilitation Order and ordered to receive intensive counselling from a deradicalisation expert.

We condemn this unduly lenient sentence which entirely fails to deter terrorism against British Jews.

As we reported in January, the teenager, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is a member of National Action, a violent neo-Nazi group which recruits teenage children and university students. The Home Secretary recently designated National Action a proscribed terrorist organisation after a long campaign by Campaign Against Antisemitism and others.

The boy, who praised the killer of MP Jo Cox, was arrested by the North East Counter Terrorism Unit (CTU) in July 2016 after a member of the public alerted police to a series of Snapchat photos of the bomb including threats to British Jews and other minorities and an image of the pipe bomb. One post showed a crude, home-made device, accompanied by the words “Incendiary explosive and home-made black powder. More to come.”

When police entered his bedroom they found it festooned with Nazi flags including swastikas and the emblem of Hitler’s Waffen SS. His laptop screensaver was an image of a Nazi eagle over a Swastika and Hitler’s famous slogan: “Ein volk, ein reich, ein führer” (one people, one nation, one führer). Police found the bomb in a drawer. They even found that he had posted on social media: “I wish the Nazis had won the war. I wish I could have lived back then and fought alongside the British free Korps, and had the privilege of praising the Führer. Hail Hitler!”

Last month he was found guilty of making explosives but acquitted of the preparation of terrorist acts. Head of Investigations at the North East CTU, Detective Superintendent Simon Atkinson, said: “The fact that this individual had constructed a viable device, capable of causing injury or harm, is extremely concerning. To make and possess such a device is dangerous and constitutes a serious criminal offence.”

Passing sentence Mr Justice Goss said the boy needed “a considerable amount of work and attention” in order to address his behaviour. The judge told the boy he rejected his claim to have been “merely fooling about with fireworks” and said “you have continued to express extreme views”. He said the boy would have received “a substantial custodial sentence” had he been convicted of preparing terrorist acts.

The teenager told the court he still held Nazi views. This pitiful sentence, once again sees a neo-Nazi being given carte blanche.

Campaign Against Antisemitism is writing to the Attorney General requesting that the sentence be reviewed.

Shomrim North West London has released an image of a suspect in an antisemitic road rage incident. A man allegedly shouted “F***ing Jewish prick” at a Jewish man before smashing a window and a wing mirror. The incident allegedly took place at the junction of Conley Hatch Lane and the A406 at 14:00 on 31st January.

Shomrim North West London are working with the Metropolitan Police Service to ensure that the assailant is brought to justice.

Anybody with information should call Shomrim North West London on 0300 999 1234 or the police on 101.

https://twitter.com/shomrimlondon/status/830092360499474434

https://twitter.com/shomrimlondon/status/826444913780867072

Hilton has become the latest brand to welcome Nazis, after a sting by The Herald exposed a secret conference at a Hilton in Glasgow at which Holocaust denier David Irving made racist remarks about Jews.

As the Lord Provost greeted guests for a black-tie Burns Supper banquet elsewhere in the hotel on Friday, Irving sat in a moth-eaten jumper and gave an audience of forty people, including a child, a self-pitying account of his life, peppered with racism.

His delusional views about Jews were on open display. He began by attacking historian Martin Gilbert’s books on Sir Winston Churchill, noting that the books were “very good, but he’s Jewish. Everything negative towards the Jews has been cut out. That’s what happens”.

He also complained about negative reviews of his own books, saying:  “I remember we got a four-page review in the Sunday Times from Arthur Koestler. He didn’t like the book. [There was] another Jew, what was his name, Rosenthal… something like that. He called it a ‘bucketful of slime’.”

According to The Herald, after signing books at the mid-way point of the event, Irving appeared to relax and stepped up his hateful comments: “I am very conscious of the fact that we are not being disturbed here this evening. I am wondering whether this means that the Jews now have given me carte blanche and said, ‘Lay off him, he’s getting old’.”

He then began voicing antisemitic conspiracy theories, saying that after 1938, “we allowed in hundreds of thousands of Jews who have taken over the country,” before a woman interrupted to shout: “And the judiciary”. Irving continued: “When you look at the way these people for the last 50 years have spent 50 years trying to destroy me and my family, as Jews, they have done this as Jews, I criticise them and they accuse me of antisemitism.” Irving also repeated his debunked fantasy that “Hitler was uninterested in the Jews and was constantly applying the brakes on all these anti-Jewish operations.” Asked by his audience about President Trump, Irving replied: “It’s very interesting to see the problems he is already having with the judiciary and the Jews.”

Irving’s audience clearly shared his views. When Irving said that there had been a plan during the Second World War to expel Jews to Madagascar, a man sneered: “Certainly improve the banking industry.”

Irving famously bankrupted himself by suing historian Deborah Lipstadt and her publisher for libel after she called him an antisemite and Holocaust denier. The case has been retold in the film Denial which was released in the UK last month. Irving has also been jailed in Austria for calling the gas chambers at Auschwitz a “fairytale”.

Perhaps Irving’s revolting views therefore come as no surprise, but the views of the Hilton management were startling. Rather than condemning Irving and explaining that he had reserved a room through a company which does not bear his name, a spokesperson for the DoubleTree by Hilton Glasgow Central said: “The hotel management does not adopt, share or promote the views of the individuals or groups to which we provide accommodations and services.”

Neutrality on antisemites and Holocaust deniers seems to be a newly-discovered problem amongst British hotels. Just last week, Campaign Against Antisemitism exposed the disgraceful neutrality of the InterContinental Hotels Group towards neo-Nazis.

John Nimmo, a vile antisemitic online troll has been sentenced to two years and three months in prison for targeting Jews with sickening antisemitic abuse and death threats, including Jewish Labour MP, Luciana Berger.

Newcastle Crown Court heard how Nimmo wrote to Berger, referring to her as “Jewish scum” and signing off as “your friend the Nazi”. He sent her images of a knife and told her she would “get it like Jo Cox”, the MP murdered by a far-right terrorist. Berger was far from being the only victim. Another victim received a message from Nimmo saying: “Watch your back you Jewish inbred, you’re dead meat,” which he signed “National Action”, referring to the antisemitic neo-Nazi terrorist group proscribed by the Home Secretary following a campaign by Campaign Against Antisemitism. One female victim told police: “I didn’t know what John Nimmo would do next. I have never encountered such an evil person in my life.”

On Friday, Nimmo pleaded guilty to nine charges relating to grossly offensive, threatening and false communications. His sentence was increased on account of his convictions for previous similar offences and the racist nature of his messages.

Judge Robert Adams told Nimmo: “You caused terror and paranoia. You attacked people who were helping society in a variety of different ways. The offences were carried out from the comfort of your own home, where you thought you would never be identified while causing misery to other people.”

We commend the victims for stepping forward, and the police for their detailed investigation.

A lecturer at the University of Bristol has allegedly been caught by one of his students writing an antisemitic article. The student, writing anonymously in the student newspaper, The Epigram, said that the article accuses “‘government elites’ of ‘manipulating’ the Holocaust” and claims that “we are discouraged from ‘critical…thinking’ about it” and that society is “privileging” the Holocaust.

According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic. Additionally, according to the expert legal opinion commissioned by Campaign Against Antisemitism, contending that either Jews, Israel or the West have “manipulated” the Holocaust to generate sympathy for Jews or for Israel or prevent criticism of them is an allegation “chosen to be emotive and upsetting to Jewish people and to generate hostility towards them.”

The student claimed that the article was published “in one of those magazines which regularly (and proudly) publishes pieces by Holocaust deniers, ‘Jewish lobby’ conspiracy theorists, and 9/11 truthers.” As soon as we heard about the matter, we contacted The Epigram’s editor who conveyed a message to the student, but the student refused to allow The Epigram to pass details of the lecturer’s article to us, preferring to raise the issue of how the Holocaust is discussed, rather than name the lecturer and make the matter about them.

In response, the University of Bristol has offered to investigate, but like us they are unable to because the student has refused to identify the article to anybody but the editor of The Epigram on condition that the article is not disclosed to others.

Regrettably, rather than the student sparking an impactful debate, there has been precious little debate, and now the lecturer is able to continue to teach unimpeded.

A month-long investigation by Campaign Against Antisemitism has exposed extensive antisemitic bigotry amongst supporters of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign UK (PSC). As it publishes its findings, Campaign Against Antisemitism has called on patrons, affiliated trade unions and students’ unions to end their association with PSC until it agrees to adopt and enforce the International Definition of Antisemitism.

For an entire month, our Online Monitoring Unit recorded antisemitic comments on PSC’s Facebook page and the response of PSC’s moderators. After reviewing and categorising nearly 3,000 comments by PSC supporters using the International Definition of Antisemitism used by the British government, the College of Policing and many other organisations and states, we found that:

  • Over 7% of all comments and replies on PSC posts were antisemitic and included anti-Jewish conspiracy myths, Holocaust denial, Holocaust inversion and religious and general hate speech against Jews.
  • There was very little counter-speech by PSC supporters. Hate speech against Jews was more likely to attract likes and supportive comment than condemnation from PSC supporters.
  • PSC permits hate speech against Jews, but does not permit it against other groups. We tested PSC’s moderation policy by posting hate speech against a non-existent people from a comic strip (the “Bangalla People”). The ‘hate speech’ we posted was almost identical to anti-Jewish sentiment which PSC allowed to be published. Within six hours, PSC removed the “Bangallaphobic” content and banned the account which posted it.
  • Some PSC Patrons were complicit in posting hate speech under the International Definition of Antisemitism.
  • Fifteen of PSC’s affiliated trade unions and all students’ unions have policies against ethnic and/or religious hate and discrimination. Affiliation to PSC is not compatible with these policies.

These findings are shocking given PSC’s public claim that it was established “in opposition to racism, including anti-Jewish prejudice”.

Our research shows that PSC has the means to block antisemitic hate speech on its Facebook page, if it wished to. It is profoundly disappointing that leading British trade unions and students’ unions, with strong anti- discrimination stances, allow themselves to be affiliated to an organisation that proliferates hate.

Our report includes sample disaffiliation motions for trade union and students’ union members to use.

PSC’s Facebook presence is a cesspool of antisemitism which proliferates and normalises hatred of Jews. We challenge the patrons, trade unions and students’ unions that endorse PSC to act on their commitment to fight racism by ending their association with PSC until it unequivocally endorses and enforces the International Definition of Antisemitism used by the British Government.

The Muslim Public Affairs Committee (MPAC) has tweeted its congratulations to Ecuador after Horacio Sevilla Borja, and Ecuadorian diplomat said he did not think there was “anything more similar” to Nazi persecution than Israeli policy. Under the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic.

The tweet was part of a series of tweets in which MPAC used an Israeli Defence Forces training video taken on a rooftop to allege that Israel trains its servicemen to throw children off rooftops. Since that allegation has no factual basis whatsoever, some might suggest that it is a modern day antisemitic blood libel.

MPAC has a long and notorious history of antisemitism. It once used its Facebook page to comment on Holocaust Memorial Day: “I’m trying not to swear so you’ll have to fill in the gaps. Take your Holocaust, roll it up nice and tight then shove it up your (be creative)!”

MPAC was banned from university campuses in 2004 for its antisemitism under the National Union of Students’ “No Platform” policy. In 2006, MPAC was accused by an all-party parliamentary inquiry into antisemitism of replacing “Jewish” with “Zionist” and articulating “Jewish conspiracy theories through the language of Zionism describing it as an ‘octopus that now penetrates every western nation and pushes it to start world war three upon Muslims’ and warning that ‘Any man who knows anything of Zionists, knows that they will not stop until the Muslims followed by mankind are dead or enslaved’”.

MPAC’s founder, Asghar Bukhari, recently spoke out to defend an antisemitic speech by the former Malaysian Prime Minster. In 2006, he was forced to repudiate David Irving, the British Holocaust denier, to whom he had sent £6000, which he claims he did under the belief that he was merely an “anti-Zionist” who had been smeared as something much worse. He also famously accused Mossad of breaking into his house and stealing one of his shoes and claimed that “any Muslim who fights and dies against Israel and dies is a martyr and will be granted paradise”. Despite this, he has been allowed to speak for British Muslims on numerous occasions, both in his capacity as a founder of MPAC and independently, including appearances on BBC News, The James O’Brien Show, LBC, Sky News and The Big Questions.

MPAC is currently running a campaign against the government’s Prevent counter-extremism strategy.

https://twitter.com/mpacuk/status/830079514210365440

Daily Mail story about two imposters who posed as Muslim clerics and killed a woman during an ‘exorcism’ has been illustrated with an image of a book bearing a star of David.

The image is from Shutterstock, an stock image library which describes the image as a “Hallowe’en still life” with “magic books”.

This is probably not antisemitism, just sheer ignorance. We expect the Daily Mail and Shutterstock to remedy the situation.

For the record, we are not aware of any lethal exorcism process being condoned in the holy book of any mainstream religion, so we hope that we won’t see the star of David replaced with another religion’s symbol.

You may wish to complain to the Daily Mail and e-mail Shutterstock at [email protected].

British Transport Police has released an image of a man they would like to speak to in connection with a spate of antisemitic stickers on London Underground. The stickers used Nazi terminology and swastikas had been drawn on by hand. British Transport Police has so far identified seven stickers at Piccadilly Circus and Covent Garden stations, which they were notified about during rush hour between Tuesday 10th January and Thursday 12th January.

The stickers were removed and British Transport Police has reviewed CCTV to try to identify the culprit. The image released is of a many they would like to speak to. Anyone with any information is asked to send a text to 61016 or call 0800 40 50 40 quoting reference 174 of 07/02/2017. Alternatively, contact Crimestoppers anonymously on 0800 555 111.

Investigating officer Ben Hurley said: “There is no place for intolerance and racism in our society and we take a firm stance against anyone who carries out these offences. All instances of hate crime are taken extremely seriously and we would actively encourage anyone who has spotted these stickers on public transport to contact us. Our enquiries are ongoing and I am hopeful that someone will recognise the man in the CCTV images.”

https://twitter.com/BTP/status/829274608960413700

Cambridge students have spoken out in support of their Jewish peers following the discovery of flyers supporting Holocaust denier David Irving found on car windscreens at the University of Cambridge’s Sidgwick lecture site, and of two swastikas drawn on a map on Jesus Green. The flyers attacked the film Denial and Jews’ account of the Holocaust, which they claimed were a “demonstrably false” Jewish lie.

Cambridgeshire Constabulary is investigating and the university has arranged patrols of staff to look for and remove any further flyers.

Meanwhile, the Austrian, Belgian, European, French, German, Hellenic, Hungarian, Irish, Dutch, Italian, Luxembourg, Polish, Russian, and Scandinavian Societies signed a joint statement decrying antisemitism and declaring solidarity with Jewish students. The Students’ Union’s Black and Minority Ethnic Campaign demanded that the incidents “should be dealt promptly and with the utmost seriousness”.

In November last year, three Jewish students were assaulted in an antisemitic attack, but the University refused to reveal the outcome of its investigations to the victims.

John Clarke, a Labour Councillor and Chairman of Black Notley Parish Council in Essex, who was a parliamentary candidate for Labour in 2015, has been found to have posted a comment on Facebook berating Holocaust victims for ‘not fighting back’. Despite being an unarmed civilian population facing the might of Nazi Germany’s genocidal forces, Jews famously did mount fierce rebellions and missions to sabotage or resist the Nazis.

We exposed Councillor Clarke on Tuesday after he tweeted an image from a neo-Nazi website claiming that the Rothschild family, a Jewish family of bankers and philanthropists, has “used usury alongside modern Israel as an imperial instrument to take over the world and all of its resources, including you and I”.

Now, Campaign Against Antisemitism has been contacted by a former pupil of Clarke’s over a Facebook rant in 2012 in which Clarke wrote: “As for WW2, I am unaware of any significant military action taken by Jews against Nazi Germany; ask older Jews why they didn’t actually FIGHT the nazis. In addition, insulting the memory of the allied forces, which included many of my relatives, who actually freed Jews from concentration camps you are the ‘deniers’ here. You may also like to know that many British ex-soldiers now in their eighties remember what the Jews did to members of the British forces sent to keep the peace in Israel, before it was declared a sovereign state in the late 1940s. I’ll bet you have an excuse for THAT disgusting bit of Jewish history”.

However as we learned when we first exposed him, Clarke believes that those who call him an antisemite are simply part of a conspiracy, tweeting: “Antisemite smear in constant overuse as those who use it expand their power base”. It is not hard to imagine who he is referring to.

Councillor Clarke is listed as a “Senior Lecturer” at the University of East London* and serves as a governor of school. We have made disciplinary complaints to the District Council, the university and the school.

Unfortunately, such views appear to be quite common within the increasingly racist Labour Party, which has been secretly readmitting members who were suspended over antisemitism. We have repeatedly stated that we do not consider the Labour Party to be safe for Jews. Sadly for many in racist Labour, including Councillor Clarke, accusations of antisemitism are like water off a duck’s back, or worse, a badge of honour.

*On 9th February, the University of East London contacted us to confirm that John Clarke no longer works there, but that his teaching profile had been accidentally left up on their website.

The London Assembly has unanimously voted to adopt the International Definition of Antisemitism. The definition was adopted by the Prime Minister in December, making the British government the first in the world to formally adopt the definition, something Campaign Against Antisemitism worked hard to achieve over many meetings. At the time, we also recognised the significant contribution of Sir Eric Pickles to the result.

The International Definition of Antisemitism is clear and detailed, leaving no doubt as to what antisemitism is. In particular, this definition tackles the full spectrum of antisemitism, from ancient slurs to conspiracy myths to antisemitism in discourse about Israel.

Labour Assembly Member Andrew Dismore proposed the motion, saying: “The recent rise in antisemitism is utterly obscene. We have a large Jewish population in London and they, like everybody else, should be protected from the words and actions of the intolerant and ignorant…In recent months we’ve seen Jewish people, and their properties, become the target for acts of hatred. If we’re to weed out antisemitism, we need to be clear about the challenge on our hands. These guidelines leave no room for doubt about the many ways in which antisemitism manifests itself. By adopting them we’re issuing a warning that any expression of antisemitism will not be tolerated. While it is vital the Assembly responds quickly and unequivocally to recent events, this motion goes beyond expressing alarm: we must take action to stamp out this despicable behaviour and we must take it now.” The motion was seconded by Conservative Assembly Member Gareth Bacon.

Throughout his career, Andrew Dismore has shown himself to be a true friend to the Jewish people of London and we are extremely grateful to him and his colleagues for taking this step.

On Saturday, a conference for neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers convened in secret at the Holiday Inn Kensington Forum, however the location of the meeting was discovered by protesters who caused the meeting to end early.

The original speaker lineup included James Thring, the antisemitic conspiracy theorist, Elizabeth Hobson, Jason Reza Jorjani, Editor-in-Chief of Arktos, Shahin Nehzad, leader of Iranian Renaissance, Ian Millard, a neo-Nazi former barrister who was recently disbarred for his views, and Ole Dammegard, another conspiracy theorist.

As usual, in attendance were various neo-Nazi antisemites and much of the conversation centred on how “oppressed” the activities of Campaign Against Antisemitism make them feel.

However, the hotel which hosted them was unashamed. We contacted InterContinental Hotels Group, which operates the hotel, which told us that they do not “discriminate” against their neo-Nazi “guests”. In a statement, a spokesman told Campaign Against Antisemitism: “When taking bookings for group or individual business we do not discriminate on the basis of affiliation or personal preference. Bookings are permitted as long as the activities do not violate any laws or constitute a significant risk to guests or employees. On Saturday the hotel was open and operating as usual and hotel staff liaised with Police to ensure that disruption to guests was kept at a minimum.”

Sometimes neo-Nazi groups manage to make bookings under false names without venues realising that they were hosting antisemites, but in this case, InterContinental Hotels Group is unabashed.

We assumed that there must be some mistake and contacted Richard Solomons, CEO of InterContinental Hotels Group, drawing his attention to the outrageous statement we had been sent. We were contacted by Emma Corcoran, Vice President for Corporate Affairs for Europe who discussed the matter with our Chairman who she told that the company was neutral in such matters. When asked whether that meant that the company was for, against or indifferent towards neo-Nazis, she promised to consult senior executives. She then confirmed in an e-mail that InterContinental Hotels Group would not be changing its stance. She wrote: “As long as the activities associated with a proposed booking at a hotel are legal and do not pose a significant risk to guests or employees, we do not determine whether or not to accept a booking based on the political affiliation, religious beliefs, personal preferences or philosophies of the relevant third party.”

On the day of the event, upon discovering that Holiday Inn Kensington Forum was unwittingly hosting a neo-Nazi conference, after the police arrived, the Duty Manager should have told the attendees to leave. Instead, we now learn that were the neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers of the London Forum to book another conference room at an InterContinental Hotels Group venue, so long as they paid the fee, they would not be discriminated against.

You may wish to let Mr Solomons and Ms Corcoran know what you think of their policy at [email protected] and [email protected].

A speaker at Monday’s demonstration against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s visit to Downing Street told Palestine Solidarity Campaign supporters that Jews should “overcome” the trauma of the Holocaust. Calling on Jews to abandon Zionism, Bruce Kent, a former priest who is now Honorary Vice President of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, told protesters that a “guilt complex” over the Holocaust is something that “inspires people in the wrong direction” when it comes to Israel.

A video captured by a JC reporter showed him saying: “The trouble is that many of us suffer from a guilt complex, certainly at my age. My wife’s great-aunt was cooped up a Berlin suburb in 1942, put in a railway carriage and taken for five days and five nights without any food or water of any sort, then put in a gas chamber. The memory is something that inspires people in the wrong direction. We have all had terrible sufferings in history – all of us. But we actually have to overcome that and start to live like human beings together. I believe it is perfectly possible. And I think there are many many Jewish people — Jews for Justice [for Palestine] for one — who know this perfectly well. To be a Jew is not to be a Zionist. That’s a different qualification.”

We are appalled that Bruce Kent expects Jews or anyone else to “overcome” the trauma of the Holocaust. It cannot be overcome, and one of its principal lessons is that Jews absolutely must have the right to self-determination, as embodied in the state of Israel. Since its establishment it has been the one country that offers persecuted Jews from around the world unconditional safe haven. Israel is the place from which Judaism originates and where half of the world’s Jewish population lives. It is the religious and cultural heart of Judaism. It is prejudiced to expect Jews to renounce all connection to Israel or be judged to be in some way deficient.

Greater Manchester Police has released images of men they would like to talk to in relation to an incident two weeks ago in which Manchester City Football Club fans shouted antisemitic slogans on a tram on their way to watch their team play against Tottenham Hotspur at Manchester’s Etihad Stadium.

The Manchester City fans bellowed at passengers: “F*** off, you F***ing yids! F***ing gas isn’t good enough for ya!” They continued: “You’re getting gassed in the morning, gassed in the morning!”

In a statement, Greater Manchester Police confirmed that a 59-year-old man has been interviewed under caution and enquiries are ongoing, and that Manchester City Football Club has been working with police to identify the men.

Detective Inspector Rebecca Boyce said: “While our enquiries are ongoing, we have identified two men who we want to speak to in connection with the incident. We take all reports of hate crime tremendously seriously and it is imperative that we follow all lines of enquiry to ensure the people involved in this frankly disgusting incident are brought to justice. The tirade of abuse that was chanted has immensely impacted not only the people at the match, but members of the wider society and we will do everything in our power to make it known that hate crime is absolutely unacceptable. If anyone recognises the men in the images, I’m strongly urging you to contact us at the earliest opportunity.”

The original smartphone footage was captured by a fellow Manchester City fan, Anthony Fallon, who was horrified. At the time, he told Manchester Evening News: “I’m not sure if there were Tottenham fans on the tram or if it was just City fans trying to cause a melée between themselves or a raucous atmosphere, but they started saying ‘come on you Spurs’. The City fans next to me, two men in their 50s, then started chanting ‘You’re getting gassed in the morning’. It was making people very uncomfortable and there was a guy who obviously couldn’t wait to get off the tram. It was like being back in the 1980s. I went to a game in Leeds in 1983 where fans were throwing banana peels at a black player. This was like a throwback to the 1980s. I haven’t heard anything like that, certainly not in the last decade. I was completely taken aback. They need to be identified. This was not just borderline racism, it was bile and hatred.”

Mr Fallon’s smartphone then caught the fans’ attention. One tells him: “Hey mate, don’t be f***ing filming everybody. I’m f***ing camera shy me, do you know what I mean? You need permission to film in public. It’s a fact so don’t do it.”

The incident took place on a Metrolink tram travelling from Market Street to the Etihad Stadium at approximately 17:10 on Saturday 21st January.

 

We commend Anthony Fallon for his presence of mind and for ensuring that this incident was brought to the attention of the police and the media. Any witnesses should contact Greater Manchester Police on 101.

A woman in Bushey has posted photographs on Facebook showing slices of bacon hanging over her doorbell next to her Mezuzah, a decorative case containing a Jewish prayer which is traditionally fixed to the doorpost of a Jewish home. She also posted photographs showing the vandalised front garden of the home she shares with her mother.

She wrote on Facebook that the incident has left her scared to leave the house as she suspects neighbours committed the crime as part of an ongoing series of hate crimes which have allegedly included them calling her mother a “Jewish c***”.

Our Crime Unit has requested further information from the victim, who says that she has endured antisemitism throughout her life, including a teacher calling her a “Nazi” and a man burning her with a cigarette because he did not want Jews to share the same pathway as him.

John Clarke, a Labour Councillor and Chairman of Black Notley Parish Council in Essex, has tweeted an image claiming that the Rothschild family, a Jewish family of bankers and philanthropists, has “used usury alongside modern Israel as an imperial instrument to take over the world and all of its resources, including you and I”. The image was clearly from antisemitic conspiracy myth website Smoloko and was first tweeted by an account whose biography proclaims that “Hitler was right”.

Councillor Clarke felt that the image represented “an oversimplified view of the world economy but containing a great deal of truth.” When challenged by other Twitter users, he retorted: “Antisemite smear in constant overuse as those who use it expand their power base”. It is not hard to imagine who he is referring to.

Startlingly, Councillor Clarke is listed as a “Senior Lecturer” at the University of East London, with which Campaign Against Antisemitism is lodging a disciplinary complaint.*

Unfortunately, such views appear to be quite common within the increasingly racist Labour Party, which has been secretly readmitting members who were suspended over antisemitism. We have repeatedly stated that we do not consider the Labour Party to be safe for Jews. Sadly for many in racist Labour, including Councillor Clarke, accusations of antisemitism are like water off a duck’s back, or worse, a badge of honour.

*On 9th February, the University of East London contacted us to confirm that John Clarke no longer works there, but that his teaching profile had been accidentally left up on their website.

https://twitter.com/JohnClarke1960/status/828877521039015936

Demonstrators protesting a visit by Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to Downing Street have been caught engaging in antisemitism.

One woman protested against Mr Netanyahu’s visit with a placard calling him a “Nazi yob murderer” and was ordered to take it down after she was pointed out to police by members of Sussex Friends of Israel attending a large rally held by the Zionist Federation of Great Britain at the entrance to Downing Street welcoming Mr Netanyahu. According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis” is antisemitic. When a reporter from Jewish News, Justin Cohen, asked her to comment and told her which publication he was from, she allegedly told him to “F*** off”.

The protesters could also be heard chanting “From the River [Jordan] to the [Mediterranean] Sea, Palestine will be free,” which only makes sense as a call for the destruction of the Jewish state and its replacement with a Palestinian state. Under the International Definition of Antisemitism, “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination” is antisemitic.

At a similar demonstration against a visit by Mr Netanyahu in 2015 a protester waved pennies at Jews telling them that “[Money] is all you know”, another protester called for a new Holocaust, and at least three men were seen flying the flag of genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisation Hizballah.

Professor Moshe Machover, who teaches philosophy at the University of London has been exposed voicing support for Hamas, a genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisation which is proscribed under the Terrorism Act. He also accused Jewish students of being under the control of the Israeli embassy.

During a panel event at Queen Mary University of London Friends of Palestine Society, which was recorded by blogger David Collier and reported by Cub Magazine, he said: “I’m not opposing their [Hamas’] armed struggle — they have a perfect right to resist with arms. I don’t condemn them. Who is responsible for the rise of Hamas in the Gaza strip? Israel. The most successful struggle was low level violence, popular mobilisation and kids throwing stones. In occupied Lebanon, Hizballah was using armed struggle very successfully, but in the case of Hamas their tactics aren’t very useful.” Machover appears to be complaining that terrorism by Hamas is not as effective as terrorism by Hizballah.

When asked by an audience member if “Israel had a right to exist” he replied “certainly not”. When challenged by a Jewish student, he retorted: “These are the kind of questions that the Israeli propaganda machine actually briefs its representatives to ask?…I know what briefing you get. I have been in this game before you were born, and I know what briefing you get. You always use the same formulations because you are singing from the same sheet of briefing. Long experience, it is a long experience that leads me because I know what Shai Masot [an Israeli embassy official included in an Al Jazeera film we have reported to Ofcom] is up to.” Under the International Definition of Antisemitism recently adopted by the British government, denying Israel’s right to exist and accusing Jews of being part of a conspiracy is antisemitic.

Queen Mary University of London told Cub Magazine: “We have a clear Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech within the law, and all events that take place on our premises are subject to security checks. Once these conditions are met, we believe that our students are able to judge for themselves the merits or otherwise of opinions put forward and views debated.” The Friends of Palestine Society also issued an apology for the “resentful ideologies” that were expressed.

That is just not good enough. Universities have an obligation under the government’s Prevent counter-extremism strategy to ensure that speakers do not come onto their campuses to spread messages in support terrorism or hatred. Universities are obliged to stop such speakers from speaking on their campuses, not to leave students to “judge for themselves”.

Campaign Against Antisemitism has now written to Queen Mary University of London to ascertain why Professor Machover was allowed to speak and lodge a complaint, and have additionally written to King’s College London and the London School of Economics to ascertain his employment status, and request that disciplinary proceedings be instigated.

The Labour Party has readmitted Terence Flanagan to the Party with a “final warning” after he claimed that Israeli secret intelligence service Mossad was behind a plot to undermine Jeremy Corbyn, and sent a message to members in which he said supporters of Israel were “polluting” the Labour Party.

The decision to readmit Flanagan was taken by the Labour Party at a national level and has caused consternation within Hampstead and Kilburn’s local branch of the Labour Party. All of the local Councillors, along with the area’s representative to the Greater London Assembly, Andrew Dismore AM, and the constituency’s MP, Tulip Siddiq, have issued criticised the decision.

Flanagan, a former worker at a print works said that he has been “vindicated” by the decision to readmit him. He now says he wants to stand for Labour at the Town Hall elections next year. He told the Camden New Journal: “It has been shown that the accusations against me were fraudulent. If I was racist or antisemitic, I wouldn’t have been allowed back in the Labour Party, and rightly so. But I’m not, and I am back in the Labour Party. There is no appeal process in the rulebook to get that warning off the record but I would dispute it being there, because I haven’t done anything wrong and Councillor [Phil] Rosenberg was wrong to make the accusations he did.”

In a statement, Chairman of the Hampstead and Kilburn Constituency Labour Party, Geoff Berridge, and its Secretary, Peter Taheri, said: “In the last few weeks, the Labour Party’s Disputes Committee has reportedly made a number of decisions (including in relation to at least one case in our [Constituency Labour Party]) on suspensions that have caused significant alarm in numerous quarters, not least, but by no means only, in the Jewish community. In addition to questions about the judgements themselves, there has been concern about the process, whereby those on the receiving end of abuse – and indeed, the local Labour Party itself – have had to learn about decisions through the local media and not through the Party’s official channels.

“This needs to be urgently reviewed. While we do not yet have full access to the facts and the reasoning behind any such decision, the absence of these would seem to be unacceptable and we will be writing to the Party’s General Secretary to ask for an urgent meeting to discuss and gain an understanding of this matter. In our local Labour Party, we expect nothing less than a ‘zero tolerance’ approach to antisemitism and we call on the Party nationally to give everyone the confidence that it shares this commitment equally. Where those returning from suspension are doing so on a formal warning for their past unacceptable behaviour, we intend to be rigorous in ensuring that any repeat offence will be dealt with speedily and strictly.”

Following Baroness Chakrabarti’s whitewash report into antisemitism in the Labour Party, the result of disciplinary decisions has been kept secret, so we only learn of outcomes that are revealed by local Labour Party members, or by those who have been disciplined.

Rebecca Massey, the newly-elected Interim Chair of Central Hove, Brunswick and Adelaide Labour Party, is an active user of Twitter. She uses her account, @beckycheabas, to propagate views familiar to those attempting to counter the strain  of antisemitism that masquerades as political discourse about Israel.

Whilst most of her tweets are dedicated to the demonisation of Israel, referring to it often in hyperbolic terms such as “pathological”, “barbaric” and “apartheid”, some reveal a deeper prejudice. For example, Massey asserts that Israel controls the British government, tweeting that “Israel has Tory & Labour parties under control”.

According to the International Definition of Antisemitism, which was adopted by the British Government in December, prompting Labour to also claim that they adopt it, “Making…stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as…Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions” is antisemitic.

When Chuka Umunna said following Ken Livingstone’s declaration that Hitler supported Zionism that “Offending Jewish people is a betrayal of our Labour values”, Massey jumped to Livingstone’s defence, tweeting that Umunna had “swallowed the conflation of Zionist with Jewish”. Massey is “Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews” according to the International Definition of Antisemitism.

On another occasion, Massey tweeted an article explaining how the “Israel lobby manufactured the UK Labour Party’s antisemitism crisis”, as if that crisis were not as a result of British Jews decrying egregious antisemitic statements by senior Labour Party figures. Since these allegations did not come from Israel but were from British Jews, the “Israel lobby” is a misnomer: she means a ‘Jewish lobby’ again deploying what the International Definition refers to as “the myth…of Jews controlling the…government or other societal institutions.”

We were unsure as we read Massey’s tweets that this could possibly be the same Rebecca Massey that has newly been elected to a position of responsibility in the Labour Party. But Greg Hadfield, the former secretary of Brighton, Hove and District Labour party, suspended last October, confirmed our fears when he tweeted his congratulations on her election.

As the local Labour Party’s minutes reveal, Rebecca Massey is the newly elected interim-Chair of Central Hove, Brunswick & Adelaide Labour Party. Moreover, she was recommended for the post by her local Momentum group. One can only wonder about how the local Jewish community in Brighton and Hove might feel about the news.

That Massey claims that Labour’s antisemitism crisis is a fabrication of the “Israel lobby” is truly ironic: for that antisemitism crisis rests squarely in the black hearts of individuals like her.

The Labour Party does not act on antisemitism. Even worse has been perpetrated by even more high-profile figures and yet has famously been dismissed after hearings in camera under the terms of the laughable Chakrabarti report. We have no confidence whatsoever therefore that Massey will be disciplined.

We will, however, continue to expose individuals like her until at some point, the Labour Party accepts that for so long as it remains an institutionally racist party, it cannot possibly command the respect of the British people.

Patrick Delaney has been sentenced to spend six months in prison for his part in an antisemitic assault in January last year. Delaney, of Twin Oaks Caravan Park, Coggeshall, Essex, admitted causing religiously aggravated harassment alarm or distress after inhaling laughing gas following an argument with his wife. He has a previous conviction for religiously aggravated abuse.

On the evening of 6th January 2016, Delaney, a 19-year-old father of one, began pelting Jewish shoppers with gas canisters, including a 13-year-old child. As Jewish people passed Poundland in Tottenham Hale, London, Delaney shouted “Hitler is coming, Heil Hitler, Heil Hitler, Heil Hitler” and threw small gas refill canisters towards Cheya Stern and her 13-year-old son, her brother Simon Lemberger and Abraham Lew. Though none of them were injured, they were badly shaken by the experience. Shomrim, the Jewish neighbourhood watch patrol, was called by the victims and liaised with the police.

The court heard that Mr Lemberger walked past Poundland first and saw three men in a parked white van repeatedly sounding the horn. Next, Ms Stern and her son passed the van and were subjected to shouts of “Heil Hitler” whilst the men tried to scare her son by making faces. They began running at which point they were pelted with gas canisters. As Mr Lemberger left a shop with Mr Lew, they too were subjected to racist abuse whilst 20 to 30 gas canisters were thrown at them.

Patrick Delaney’s brothers Francis Delaney, 23, and Michael Doherty, 25, were also in the van and were arrested, but charges against them were dropped.

In a victim impact statement, Ms Stern said: “This incident has brought back such bad memories for me and has left me with a shocking feeling inside. I know it will take me a long time to get over. It was a truly horrible experience for us. We didn’t do anything to these men, we didn’t agitate them. We were just in fact people wanting to go shopping.”

Passing sentence, Judge John Dodd, QC, told Delaney: “On an evening last year, Ms Stern and her 13-year-old son, along with her brother and a friend of his, all visited the retail park in Tottenham Hale. All are members of the Orthodox Jewish community here in north London and that fact would have been clearly visible to you. You repeatedly subjected those individuals, including Ms Stern’s 13-year-old boy, to foul language. All recall you referring to Hitler and saying Hitler was coming. Those words were plainly intended to cause distress and they plainly did. You and your two companions were parked up in order to sniff laughing gas. You threw some of those metal canisters towards your victims. This conduct must have added to the air of menace that you so successfully generated. It is important to recall that group had done absolutely nothing to offend you or to upset you. Yet you chose to insult them. Ms Stern, as a mother, was particularly upset for the sake of her son. What parent would not be seeing their child exposed to this sort of disgraceful behaviour?

“This is plainly in my view serious enough so as to call for an immediate custodial sentence. Your conduct was simply disgraceful. No civilised society can allow any such conduct to be considered in any sense acceptable. We all need, especially in these challenging times, to remember that no man, woman or child is an island. We must show, all of us, compassion towards each other and even if you do not agree with the lifestyles of others you must tolerate them. You didn’t.”

Delaney hugged his wife and cried as he was taken down to the cells.

In a statement, Rabbi Herschel Gluck, President of Stamford Hill Shomrim, the Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol, said: “The case has been dealt with extremely well. One sees that everyone is taking this very seriously and everyone understands the sensitivity of this matter vis-a-vis the Jewish community. I feel in general that a message has to go out that this type of behaviour is totally beyond the pale. On a personal level, I do feel for him. I feel that his family background is such that I have compassion.”

We commend Shomrim and authorities for taking this offence seriously, and we are particularly satisfied that Delaney was given a suitable custodial sentence, sending a message of deterrence to others who might be tempted to target Jews.

Police are searching for a man who attacked a Jewish driver in an antisemitic fit of road rage. Videos seen by Campaign Against Antisemitism show a man shouting “F***ing Jewish prick” at a Jewish man. He allegedly then smashed a window and a wing mirror. Shomrim North West London are working with the Metropolitan Police Service to ensure that the assailant is brought to justice.

A suspect has been arrested in connection with a crime in August last year in which a man allegedly shouted “Heil Hitler” and other antisemitic abuse at Jewish victims in London. We commend the victim for persevering with the Metropolitan Police Service and insisting that they level charges against the suspect, and we salute Shomrim Stamford Hill, the Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol, which has assisted the victim throughout.

Lord Ouseley, the Chairman of Kick It Out, an anti-racism campaign which has done sterling work to fight bigotry within football, has disgraced himself by co-signing a letter to The Guardian calling for the Labour Party to readmit Marc Wadsworth.

Wadsworth, a Labour activist, was suspended by the Party for his actions at the launch of Baroness Chakrabarti’s whitewash report into antisemitism in the Party. With Jeremy Corbyn and Baroness Chakrabarti looking on inertly, Wadsworth stood to harangue Ruth Smeeth, a Labour MP who is Jewish, for supposedly conspiring with the media. Smeeth left the event in tears and called on Jeremy Corbyn to resign.

The letter published in The Guardian makes clear that Lord Ouseley and his fellow signatories wish to “make public our support for Wadsworth” and to publicise that “a demonstration will be held to support him”. The signatories end with a “demand that he is reinstated immediately”.

Lord Ouseley is unfit to lead an anti-racism campaign if he is blind to antisemitism.

On Holocaust Memorial Day this year, a survivor called Dorit Oliver-Wolff spoke of her experiences surviving antisemitic persecution as a Jewish child in Nazi-occupied Europe. She recalled that when walking with her mother in a park in Budapest, a middle-aged woman approached her, bent over and spat in her eyes, telling her she was “a filthy Jew”.

It is difficult to imagine the irrational hatred that could so possess a grown woman as to make her spit in the face of a little five-year-old, but the evidence that such hatred still exists is, sadly, not far away.

When we commemorate the Holocaust, the organised disaster that saw six million Jews murdered, the antisemites are only spitting distance away, and like the woman in that Budapest park in 1941, they simply cannot control themselves.

Jackie Walker, for example, a Labour Party member who sits on Momentum’s steering committee, already once suspended for repeating the lie that Jews were the chief financiers of the slave trade, went out of her way to attack Holocaust Memorial Day (which she once called a “celebration”). She repeated her infamous and original erroneous attack on the commemoration of the Holocaust, suggesting that Jews do not remember other genocides on Holocaust Memorial Day, allowing it to be assumed that there is something malevolent in Jews mourning the disaster the befell them, and that the event promotes remembering the genocide of Jews at the expense of remembering other genocides. Walker was suspended from her Party for a second time.

David Ward, a Liberal Democrat with a long history of antisemitism also could not help himself. Last Thursday, we learned as much about him from when he chose to speak, as from what he said: by utilising the most widely used contemporary antisemitic charge against the Jewish community — so often used by Baroness Jenny Tonge who had to leave the Liberal Democrats after being suspended over antisemitism — that everything the Jewish people say or do is a front to protect Israel from criticism, including remembering the dead victims of the Holocaust.

Though the timing of these statements is clearly offensive, they are as nothing compared to the hypocrisy of the Labour Party and Jeremy Corbyn, who makes great play of how he mourns the Holocaust, saying: “This Holocaust Memorial Day let us…redouble our efforts to defeat evil and intolerance.” Yet the pious Mr Corbyn has taken money from the Iranian state to appear on their TV Channel, a state that denies the Holocaust and runs an annual cartoon competition mocking it. He has praised Hamas as “dedicated… to social and political justice” and describe working with them as a “pleasure and honour” despite Hamas’s constitution being genocidally antisemitic and quoting of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a text on which Hitler based his propaganda. He had a long and close friendship with the Holocaust denier Paul Eisen. He has steadfastly refused to disown or apologise for his actions since becoming Party Leader. He has recently expressed public and explicit support for Jackie Walker, and warmly welcomed her back into the Labour Party after she was inexplicably allowed to return following a secret hearing. Ken Livingstone, lest we forget, who has nurtured the idea that Hitler supported the right of Jews to self-determination, is still, astonishingly, a party member, as is Sir Gerald Kaufman MP, a man who said that Jews use money to control political parties. The list is longer still and is beyond disgraceful: it has stained British public life.

Whilst Tim Farron, Leader of the Liberal Democrats said that the day represented a chance to “think about our responsibilities as individuals, citizens and nations”, he pointedly failed to rebuke antisemitism in his own Party’s ranks.

The theme of Holocaust Memorial Day this year was “How can life go on?” The horror of the Holocaust is unspeakable, the stain on humanity indelible. One might ask: “How can antisemitism go on?” and a great part of the answer lies with the fact that our political leaders allow senior members of their movements to publicly use the occasion of Holocaust Memorial Day to spit in Jewish faces.

University College London (UCL) has today published the report of its investigation into a violent antisemitic protest last October.

The protest against the presence of an Israeli speaker at the university reportedly resulted in three female students being assaulted, whilst protesters surrounded and trapped attendees despite efforts by university security and police to separate them from the protesters. At one point protesters jumped through a window to confront the terrified audience of predominantly Jewish students.

Campaign Against Antisemitism submitted a formal complaint to UCL’s Provost, Professor Michael Arthur, over the protest and the antisemitic tweets of Yahya Abu Seido, President of UCLU Friends of Palestine Society.

Professor Arthur commissioned Professor Geraint Rees, Dean of the UCL Faculty of Life Sciences to investigate, and Campaign Against Antisemitism provided input into the investigation.

The investigation upheld our complaint with the following findings:

  • Those connected with the protest stirred up hatred through the “wide circulation on social media of an inflammatory message”;
  • “Some individuals at UCL and from at least four other institutions…planned to prevent the event taking place; created a hostile, aggressive and intimidatory atmosphere; and conducted their protest noisily and aggressively such that many students, staff and other attendees felt intimidated by their behaviour”;
  • Protesters who jumped through the windows “intentionally disrupted and interfered” with the event;
  • A protester “engaged in physically aggressive behaviour towards attendees that included attempting to block entry…and pushing a female attendee necessitating police intervention”;
  • The chant of “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” calls for the destruction of the state of Israel, and as such is antisemitic under the International Definition of Antisemitism;
  • Students were intimidated by shouts of “Shame!” from the protesters as they left the event;
  • UCL failed to “adequately protect freedom of expression on campus”, including “an initial failure to accurately assess and report risk” and failures on the day of the event including that “a perimeter was not secured around the ultimate venue and the windows were not secured prior to use of the venue”; and
  • Statements by UCL and the Students’ Union stated that the protests were peaceful when this was clearly contrary to the evidence.

In our interactions with Professor Rees, we recommended that he propose various measures, some of which he has adopted.

Five students have been referred for disciplinary action. We have stressed the importance of disciplinary action in this area being firm, swift and transparent, recalling the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee findings. Additionally Professor Rees has proposed new rules for visitors to UCL, which are needed to prevent intimidation by outsiders against whom UCL has limited recourse. He also called for loudspeakers to be banned in protests near contentious events.

Whilst Professor Rees has called for various rule changes, they are not specific and we are now writing to UCL to propose that the International Definition be adopted by for disciplinary purposes, that future contentious events be monitored by members of staff with recording equipment, and that those who engage in intimidation be referred to the police whenever crimes are committed.

David Icke is a modern-day antisemitic hate preacher who uses social media, his books and his stage performances to incite hatred towards Jewish people. His preaching is so absurd that since the 1990s he has been dismissed as a crank, but because he is dismissed there has been no major opposition to him and he has built up a following of thousands upon thousands of disciples whom he has persuaded to adamantly believe that the world is in the grip of a conspiracy run by the “Rothschild Zionists”.

Campaign Against Antisemitism has marked Holocaust Memorial Day at the Holocaust Memorial Day ceremony held by the Metropolitan Police Service. Stephen Silverman, our Director of Investigations and Enforcement was invited to light a memorial candle at the ceremony, where he also discussed resurgent antisemitism with Deputy Commissioner Craig Mackey.

We also worked with the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire to arrange a conversation between a Holocaust survivor, Susan Pollack MBE, and a Jewish student, Binyomin Gilbert, about antisemitism in Britain.

Campaign Against Antisemitism’s Regulatory Enforcement Unit has filed a complaint with Ofcom, the media regulator, over Al Jazeera English’s so-called investigation entitled “The Lobby”.

The four-part programme broadcast earlier this month is premised on an arrogant remark by a junior Israeli Embassy employee and an MP’s former adviser. From one brief conversation between two junior employees, the programme attempts to extrapolate the existence of a full-bodied conspiracy. It suggests that swathes of the British Jewish community are in league with the Israeli government to subvert British democracy, and that any action by Israel to promote its interests is not simply normal diplomacy but a nefarious conspiracy.

All broadcasters in the UK are obliged to abide by Ofcom’s Broadcasting Code, however we have alleged that the programme breached several core Principles of the Broadcasting Code, including accuracy, impartiality, fair treatment of individuals, harmful material and incitement. Amongst other breaches of the Principles, the programme:

  • Argues that the accusation of antisemitism is simply a means by which the Israeli government slurs its enemies, and that by extension Jewish complaints about antisemitic prejudice are disingenuous;
  • Proposes that the Labour Party’s antisemitism crisis is manufactured;
  • Belittles genuine and legitimate Jewish concerns;
  • Portrays a particular Jewish individual as a thug cynically pretending to be a victim of antisemitism;
  • Spins routine internal political discussion and external organising in relation to Israel as conspiratorial and malign;
  • Portrays the Israeli Embassy as controlling a wide network of Jewish and non-Jewish organisations; and
  • Places Shai Masot, a junior Israeli Embassy employee, at the centre of a network, reminiscent of the well-known, historic antisemitic “Jewish Spider” claim with no evidence other than an arrogant offhand remark made by Mr Masot.

Under the terms of the International Definition of Antisemitism, “The Lobby” crosses the line from legitimate discourse about Israel and becomes antisemitic by:

  • “Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions”;
  • “Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations”; and
  • “Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.”

We await Ofcom’s response.

An emergency motion proposed on 24th January by Avrahum Sanger, President of the Jewish Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), has been amended to avoid recognising Jewish students’ rights to decide what they find to be antisemitic. It has also declared Zionism to be a form of extremism to be combatted using a new counter-extremism policy.

On behalf of Jewish students at SOAS, Sanger had proposed a motion to restore kosher food which had been removed from Students’ Union facilities, reinstate the Jewish prayer area and mandate the Students’ Union to appoint an officer to protect Jewish students. The Union passed the motion, but only with amendments which swapped protection of Jewish students for protection of all students from all types of racism. The Union had one more condition: removal of a line in the motion confirming that “Jewish students should be given the right to self-determination and be able to define what constitutes hatred against their group like all other minority groups”. The Union then passed a counter-extremism policy, but during the debate it was made clear that it was to be used to prevent anyone with “Zionist ideology” from participating in campus life.

Since the publication of the Macpherson Report in 1999, Britain has recognised the need for minority groups to be able to define prejudice against them, and by denying that right to Jews, SOAS Students’ Union is discriminating and sending a message that Jews cannot be trusted to honestly decide for themselves what is and is not antisemitic. Additionally, the International Definition of Antisemitism adopted by the Government in December states that “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour)” is antisemitic. It echoes a finding of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Inquiry into the Rise of Antisemitism in Britain found antisemitism to be especially severe within the student movement and stated that use of “the word ‘Zionist’ (or worse, ‘Zio’) as a term of abuse has no place in a civilised society”.

Shocked by the result, Sanger has issued a statement saying: “I proposed a simple motion calling upon the Students’ Union to protect Jewish students but they responded by declaring Jewish self-determination to be extremism and a right that Jews uniquely should not have. My university is at a crisis point. It is at risk of becoming unsafe for Jews.”

SOAS has long been nicknamed the “School of Antisemitism” for its long history of victimising Jewish students. Baroness Deech recently declared it a university Jewish students “should avoid” and Campaign Against Antisemitism has lodged complaints with SOAS and the Charity Commission over an antisemitic lecture. SOAS Palestine Society recently proposed to define what Jewish students could take offence to and Jewish students have been threatened, as detailed in a hard-hitting Evening Standard exposé last week.

SOAS is a university on the brink. Campus politics have become a nest of extremism and antisemitic bigotry. Jewish students sought their Students’ Union’s protection and in response the Union voted that Jews uniquely have no right to decide what they find offensive. Additionally the Union decided Jews alone now have no right to self-determination, and that to say otherwise is ‘extremist’. Counter-extremism has been turned on its head and is being used at SOAS to block out voices of tolerance. SOAS must take responsibility and protect its Jewish students.

We are investigating a number of options. It is intolerable that in 2017, in Britain’s capital, a major university’s student body is broadcasting at full volume that Jewish students should be discriminated against.

Malia Bouattia, President of the National Union of Students, has previously called Birmingham University a “Zionist outpost in higher education” because it has “the largest Jsoc [Jewish student society] in the country.” She has railed against “Zionist-led media outlets”, defended Palestinian terrorism as “resistance” and voted against condemning ISIS. When called on by Campaign Against Antisemitism and countless student leaders to retract her comments, she penned an article in The Guardian claiming that her accusers were simply sexists and racists. Bouattia then drew further condemnation in July when she used her casting vote to strip Jewish students of their ability to elect their own representative.

Student leaders have gone so far as to write open letters expressing embarrassment and apologising to Jewish students for the actions of Bouattia and the National Union of Students. The Union of Jewish Students has called for her resignation, as have other student groups including Oxford University Students’ Union. The House of Commons Home Affairs Committee’s Inquiry into the Rise of Antisemitism in Britain strongly criticised her.

It is outrageous that Malia Bouattia has been invited to the national Holocaust Memorial Day ceremony whilst remaining totally unrepentant over her past comments and actions.

Shomrim North West London has released CCTV footage showing a man repeatedly vandalising cars parked outside a synagogue and Jewish community centre. The most recent vandalism occurred outside Od Yosef Chai synagogue on Finchley Lane in Barnet, London at 20:35 on 15th January. Each time the man passes the building, he vandalises the cars parked outside, but does not vandalise the cars parked outside other buildings.

Witnesses have been asked to contact the police on 101 or Shomrim North West London on 0300 999 1234.

Greater Manchester Police are hunting Manchester City Football Club fans who shouted antisemitic slogans on a tram on their way to watch their team play against Tottenham Hotspur at Manchester’s Etihad Stadium.

The Manchester City fans bellowed at passengers: “F*** off, you F***ing yids! F***ing gas isn’t good enough for ya!” They continued: “You’re getting gassed in the morning, gassed in the morning!”

Looking on was a fellow Manchester City fan, Anthony Fallon, who was horrified. He captured the incident on his smartphone, so that he could provide the footage to Greater Manchester Police. He told Manchester Evening News: “I’m not sure if there were Tottenham fans on the tram or if it was just City fans trying to cause a melée between themselves or a raucous atmosphere, but they started saying ‘come on you Spurs’. The City fans next to me, two men in their 50s, then started chanting ‘You’re getting gassed in the morning’. It was making people very uncomfortable and there was a guy who obviously couldn’t wait to get off the tram. It was like being back in the 1980s. I went to a game in Leeds in 1983 where fans were throwing banana peels at a black player. This was like a throwback to the 1980s. I haven’t heard anything like that, certainly not in the last decade. I was completely taken aback. They need to be identified. This was not just borderline racism, it was bile and hatred.”

Mr Fallon’s smartphone then caught the fans’ attention. One tells him: “Hey mate, don’t be f***ing filming everybody. I’m f***ing camera shy me, do you know what I mean? You need permission to film in public. It’s a fact so don’t do it.”

The incident took place on a Metrolink tram travelling from Market Street to the Etihad Stadium at approximately 17:10 on Saturday 21st January.

A spokesman for Transport for Greater Manchester said: “We’re extremely disappointed to see this kind of mindless behaviour taking place on a tram. This vile and hateful language has no place on football terraces, public transport or anywhere else. We will gladly work with police to bring these individuals to justice so we strongly urge anyone with any information about the incident to come forward.”

A spokesman for Manchester City Football Club said: “Manchester City strongly condemns the use of any antisemitic language and we are co-operating with the investigation into this matter.”

Greater Manchester Police have not yet issued photographs of any suspects.

We commend Anthony Fallon for his presence of mind and for ensuring that this incident was brought to the attention of the police and the media. Any witnesses should contact Greater Manchester Police on 101.

Two Polish football hooligans who sprayed antisemitic graffiti and football slogans across Tunbridge Wells in a one-night rampage have been sentenced to spend 22 weeks in prison.

On 17th November 2016, Sebastian Tancula and Damian Filipek met at Stansted Airport and went out drinking. Filipek, a scrapyard worker who has been in the UK for four years and Tancula, who was visiting, painted slogans on twenty homes and businesses across Tunbridge Wells. Maidstone Crown Court heard that whilst one of the men vandalised the buildings, the other prevented members of the public from stopping him. Customers and staff at a pub alerted the police and one customer even tailed the men until the police arrived, finding them with their hands covered in red paint — “literally red-handed” as prosecutor Mary Jacobson put it.

The graffiti consisted of football slogans such as “Wisla Sharks” accompanied by “Amti Jude” meaning “anti-Jewish” and a star of David. In Poland the fans of Wisla Sharks are infamous for violence and antisemitism.

Tunbridge Wells Borough Council was left with a clean-up bill of £2,641 but the court heard that most of the businesses and homes affected would need to undertake further repair work at their own cost. One of the businesses was due to have its grand opening the day after the crimes were committed, causing its owners “outrage, shock and upset”.

Craig Evans, defending Filipek, said the scrapyard worker was “sincerely remorseful” and Danny Moore, defending Tancula, said the machine operator was not antisemitic and was merely directing hatred at the Jewish fans of rival team Wisla Krakow, rather than the wider community more generally, which he seems to have felt was a defence.

Krakow’s Jewish population consisted of 60,000 men, women and children before the Holocaust, but the Jewish population now stands at a few hundred people.

At Maidstone Crown Court, Tancula and Filipek pleaded guilty to eighteen offences of criminal damage and two offences of racially aggravated criminal damage for the antisemitic slogans. Sentencing them, Judge Charles Macdonald QC said that “The expression of such antisemitic ideas is deeply offensive”.

A swastika found on a London Underground Northern Line train has been reported following Campaign Against Antisemitism’s appeal for witnesses to any antisemitic behaviour in North West London this weekend to contact Shomrim.

A member of the public contacted North West London Shomrim after finding the swastika drawn in marker pen on a train in either the last or the second-from-last carriage of a Northern Line train which left Edgware station between 19:00 and 20:00 on Saturday night, departing from platform 2. North West London Shomrim have reported the graffiti to the police over a possible link to the spate of antisemitic incidents over the weekend which included Jews being pelted with eggs and a brick covered in antisemitic slurs being hurled through a Jewish family’s window.

If you saw anything suspicious, please contact Shomrim North West London.

An advertisement for the film Denial which will open in cinemas later this month has been defaced with antisemitic graffiti. A photograph of Jewish actress Rachel Weisz, who plays Jewish historian Deborah Lipstadt, was defaced with the word “B-Witch” and a star of David. Other actors were labelled as “Creep”. The film retells the story of how antisemitic Holocaust denier David Irving sued Lipstadt and her publisher for libel after she called him an antisemitic Holocaust denier in one of her books. He lost and the case bankrupted him.

The defaced poster was reported by Shomrim North West London, a Jewish volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol.

The calm of the Jewish sabbath (Shabbat) was shattered yesterday as a brick covered in swastikas was hurled through the window of a Jewish family’s home, Jewish pedestrians were pelted with eggs and a swastika was drawn on another home.

Shomrim North West London, a volunteer neighbourhood watch patrol run by the Jewish community, have reported that in three seemingly separate incidents, Jews were sought out for racist attacks.

The first incident came as Jewish families walked home from attending traditional Friday night dinner at friends’ and families’ homes. At approximately 22:30, a car was seen driving down Edgwarebury Lane, Edgware, from which the occupants hurled eggs at recognisably-Jewish pedestrians.

As day broke on Saturday, a brick on which swastikas and antisemitic slurs were drawn was thrown through the window of a Jewish family’s home in Edgware, leaving them feeling unsafe in their own home.

Then, later in the day, police discovered a swastika on a residential building on Watford Way, Mill Hill.

Shomrim North West London is appealing for any witnesses to call them on 0300 999 1234. The Metropolitan Police Service is investigating the incidents.

These were hit-and-run attacks on Jewish families at night. Antisemitic crime is on the rise and these cowardly attacks must lead to arrests and convictions. Jewish families in our capital should not be living in fear of antisemitic attacks.

Jeremy Corbyn’s brother, Piers Corbyn, a climate forecaster and fervent supporter of his brother, has issued his latest long-term prediction on Twitter: that Jewish conspirators and the Royal Family will force Donald Trump into war, just like they did to Hitler.

Piers Corbyn retweeted @whiteknight0011, a notorious neo-Nazi who declared that “They will force Trump in to war What do you think happened to Hitler? Bilderberg CIA IMF Banker Gangsters They are the problem” along with four images.

One shows Lord Jacob Rothschild, the Jewish banker and philanthropist, against the background of a Nazi flag, claiming that he controls the world. A second shows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a puppeteer controlling ISIS through Israeli intelligence agency Mossad, orchestrating the war in Syria and Paris attacks as Lord Rothschild and the Queen look on approvingly. A third image shows the faces of supposed Jewish conspirators who run the world to society’s detriment, proclaiming: “Know your enemy”. The last image shows a family photo of the Royal Family, claiming that they are in cahoots with these Jewish conspirators in committing “the worst genocides, invasions and theft in all history.”

Piers and Jeremy have a long history of political solidarity. Piers has boasted of the family’s anti-racist credentials, but the mask is slipping. The man who now broadcasts that the Jews were responsible for the Second World War, is the same that claimed a Jewish conspiracy against his brother: when Jewish MP Louise Ellman complained of antisemitic attacks against her, Piers Corbyn accused her of using it as a cover for political attack, tweeting: “ABSURD! JC+ All #Corbyns are committed #AntiNazi. #Zionists cant cope with anyone supporting rights for #Palestine”. Brother Jeremy’s response: “He’s not wrong”.

The apple does not fall far from the tree in the Corbyn household. Jeremy Corbyn has not publicly repudiated his brother, nor any number of individuals in the Labour Party attacking the Jewish community. We would like to think it is time to start, but have long realised that any pretence that Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour is ‘anti-racist’ are now history.

What will happen next? Will Piers Corbyn say he didn’t notice the images? It’s impossible to comprehend the text without looking at the images. Will Jeremy Corbyn rally to his brother’s defence as he has before? Will they ignore the incident?

Jeremy Corbyn endorsed his brother’s views last time he alleged there was a Jewish conspiracy. Now that tweeting Jewish conspiracies is perfectly normal in the Labour Party of today, maybe Jeremy Corbyn will give his brother a peerage.

https://twitter.com/JolyonGreen/status/822690033807269889

https://twitter.com/whiteknight0011/status/822555579763884036

A couple out for a walk along the Grand Union Canal in Ealing were shocked to find graffiti depicting a star of David hanging from a gallows. Their daughter, Liorah Tchiprout shared a photo on Facebook and commented: “My lovely parents went for a walk yesterday afternoon by Grand Union Canal near their home in Ealing, West London and saw this. Lovely. I’m making this public so it can be shared. Just in case people don’t believe that antisemitism is still alive and well in the UK.”

A hard-hitting feature by Rosamund Urwin in London’s Evening Standard has exposed to London’s public the sad truth that most British Jews have long known: that SOAS, the School of Oriental and African Studies, might just as well be named the School of Antisemitism.

Noting SOAS students’ reputation for championing civil rights, and its proud tradition of nurturing future activists from 133 countries around the world, Urwin calls out the festering antisemitism that stains SOAS’s image with hypocrisy. Urwin is scathing in her analysis, pointing out that SOAS Students’ Union has a People of Colour Officer, two Anti-Racism Officers and an Equality and Liberation Co-President.

Urwin calls out the festering antisemitism that stains SOAS’s image with hypocrisy.

In December the cross-bench peer Baroness Deech told the Daily Telegraph’s Education Editor, Camilla Turner, that “amongst Jewish students there is gradually a feeling that there are certain universities that you should avoid — definitely SOAS”.

Incidents at SOAS have been causing serious concern, and those concerns centre around the activities of SOAS Palestine Society. Urwin notes that the Palestine Society is a dominant force on campus: “The Israel-Palestine conflict dominates discussion of global affairs at many universities but nowhere more so than at SOAS. In 2015 the union held a referendum where it voted to boycott Israel. And last year, it held an Israeli Apartheid Week ‘to raise awareness of Israel’s apartheid policies over the Palestinian people’.”

Campaign Against Antisemitism can reveal that the Palestine Society receives more funding than all but two of the 187 other non-sport societies at SOAS, receiving approximately 8% of the funds spent on non-sport societies every year.

It seems unlikely that the current leaders of the Palestine Society will face any consequences for arranging an antisemitic lecture on their campus.

In November, Campaign Against Antisemitism filed a complaint over an antisemitic event lecture organised by SOAS Palestine Society and the response we received showed little urgency. SOAS told us that the Students’ Union — a separate body — had investigated and was now in discussions with the Charity Commission. We found that the Students’ Union had declared the event not to have been antisemitic and that is what they told the Charity Commission. We wrote to the Charity Commission to set the record straight, but now it seems that nobody at SOAS intends to do anything to right this wrong until the Charity Commission has investigated, which is likely to take until after the protagonists have graduated and left SOAS for good. It seems unlikely that the current leaders of the Palestine Society will face any consequences for arranging an antisemitic lecture on their campus.

Shortly after the antisemitic lecture, in response to criticism, the Palestine Society planned a new event. SOAS’s Jewish students discovered that the Palestine Society planned to hold an event defining antisemitism, telling Jews what they are allowed to find offensive, and attempting to justify certain forms of Jew-hatred. It is hard to imagine SOAS inviting a speaker to tell black or gay students that they are no longer allowed to be offended by certain types of racism or homophobia — such an event would trigger a national outcry. In this case, there was only a Jewish outcry, and Palestine Society was quietly pressed to cancel the event, which they did.

“Some students tell me they are too scared to wear the star of David, or speak Hebrew”

Intimidation of Jewish students at SOAS is not difficult, mainly because the Jewish student population is small: Urwin discovered a 2016 Freedom of Information request which found that only 39 of the 5,900 students at SOAS admitted to being Jewish on their signup forms, and Avrahum Sanger, President of SOAS Jewish Society says that only about seven are active in Jewish life on campus, such that it is. “Some students tell me they are too scared to wear the star of David, or speak Hebrew, and Israeli students don’t want to attend Jewish events because they’re afraid of being singled out,” Sanger tells Urwin. He continues: “Even I feel uneasy when I go into the student union. And yet someone from the student union told me that the anti-racism officers didn’t have a mandate to address antisemitism as it wasn’t in their manifesto. Anyway, the only form of antisemitism people think of here is Hitler.”

It is no surprise. Graffiti found at SOAS in April last year threatened “BDS or else”, referring to the campaign to sever all ties with Israel. But Israel is the place from which Judaism originates and where half of the world’s Jewish population lives. Since its establishment it has been the one country that offers persecuted Jews from around the world unconditional safe haven. It is the religious and cultural heart of Judaism. To tell Jews that they will be treated as pariahs unless they renounce all connection to Israel and Israelis is antisemitic. Yet not only is that what SOAS’ few Jewish students are expected to do according to their Students’ Union, this graffiti appears to be threatening violence if they fail to comply. Few incidents are recorded in graffiti however, and we hear of too many incidents in which Jewish students are told, for example: “Why don’t you and your family f*** off to Israel?”

It is sobering to imagine for a moment that you are a Jewish student returning from lectures, and you stumble upon a vigil held for terrorist thugs who killed Jews for being Jews at the behest of genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisations like Hamas.

The influence of extremism on campus is also clear, though rarely highlighted. One such glimpse came in November 2015, when the Palestine Society organised a “vigil” commemorating the deaths of 72 Palestinian “martyrs” despite the fact that some of the “martyrs” were Islamist terrorists who had been killed attempting to murder Israeli Jews for being Jews, and who had declared allegiance to terrorist groups proscribed under EU and British terrorism laws. The absurd coverage of the resulting controversy in SOAS Spirit, a student newspaper, shows the nature of discourse on campus. It is sobering to imagine for a moment that you are a Jewish student returning from lectures, and you stumble upon a vigil held for terrorist thugs who killed Jews for being Jews at the behest of genocidal antisemitic terrorist organisations like Hamas.

Sanger feels that the situation is desperate. He revealed to Urwin that he has proposed an emergency motion at the Students’ Union, calling for equality for Jewish students. Having to propose such a motion at a major British university in 2017 should be the stuff of nightmares, not reality. Sanger’s motion highlights the disappearance of kosher provision and the withdrawal of a Jewish prayer area. He also wants the Students’ Union to appoint a Jewish Officer to work with the Anti-Racism Officers and to help to organise a workshop on antisemitism in Freshers’ Week.

Campaign Against Antisemitism continues to pursue its complaints with SOAS and the Charity Commission. We are extremely grateful to Rosamund Urwin for her coverage of this issue, and to Avrahum Sanger for his bravery in standing up to antisemitism at SOAS.

Earlier this week we asked Manchester City Council to impose a fine and licence conditions on the O2 Apollo theatre for providing a platform to antisemitic hate preacher David Icke, who delivered a twelve-hour sermon on his world view, including his notorious segment on the supposed conspiracy he calls “Rothschild Zionism”. We asked witnesses to the performance to e-mail us, and interestingly Icke’s associates urged his disciples to contact us. We have received numerous e-mails from Icke’s devotees unanimously reassuring us that Icke is no antisemite, and his message is one of love and compassion.

We decided to publish extracts below, unedited save for the grammar and spelling.

While their comments are patently risible, they are also highly dangerous. They illustrate how easy it is for a demagogue like Icke to convince people that age-old antisemitic conspiracy myths are real. Icke passionately warns his followers that the “Rothschild Zionists” have the world in their grip, and that even the antisemitic Protocols of the Elders of Zion should be heeded. It is perhaps unsurprising that people who are willing to pay up to £80 to be lectured for twelve hours straight by Icke are susceptible to his views. It is, nonetheless, extremely alarming. He preys on ordinary people who are suggestible, and persuades them that he is revealing a hidden truth, and that they cannot trust anybody else to be honest with them. Like a cult leader, he “wakes them up” from the “dreamworld” they were living in before they met him.

Take David Wright for example. He resoundingly endorsed Icke’s philosemitic credentials, telling us: “Just because he believes a Jewish elite run the world doesn’t make him an antisemite.” In a separate e-mail, he assured us that: “David Icke is nothing like an antisemite,” reinforcing the point with a link to David Icke’s “Rothschild Zionism” speech.

Kevin Whittle sent us an equally impassioned rebuttal of the accusation that Icke is an antisemite: “Mr Icke did indeed mention the Rothschild Zionists and global elite who are factually running things in this world. He also gave proof of this in his presentation. More and more people understand what the Rothschild Zionists have done to the world […]. Problem is they have 80% of the lobby in the UK and practically own the US congressionals. When talking about Zionism David always referred to the Rothschild Zionists to make it clear to the thought police he was talking about a particular faction hiding behind the Jewish faith.”

Kaya Davidson expressed her indignation at the notion that Icke is an antisemite thus: “It is my understanding that he believes, upon conducting extensive unbiased research, a group of Zionists control the media, many political decisions that affect us all. How is that antisemitic?”

Bob Alford suggested that broadening our choice of reading matter would help us to understand Icke better: “May I recommend you read a book called ‘The falsification of history’ by John Hamer. Here you will find documented and remembered proof about the Hitler myth. (I am NOT a neo-Nazi, by the way, before you start accusing me of causing all the s*** the ‘Jews’ bring on themselves for self pity. Check it out, they even have a word for it.)” In order to leave us in absolutely no doubt that he is “NOT a neo-Nazi”, Mr Alford added a postscript: “There’s a great video on YouTube called ‘Adolf Hitler – the greatest story NEVER told’. If you are non-biased, give it a look, you might learn something you’re not taught to believe. Then, who knows, you might even find some self respect and pack in your well-paid job of attacking ‘antisemites’ for your Zionist masters.” The Greatest Story Never Told is a virulently antisemitic film that seeks to rehabilitate Hitler and his policies, while blaming Jews for the circumstances that led to World War 2.

A fan writing in under the name “Tym R”, in his defence of Icke, adds Holocaust denial to classic antisemitic conspiracy theory: “…a nefarious cabal of Khazar-Ashkenazi ersatz Jews of convenience control the world to the global society’s detriment and have hijacked the term ‘antisemitic’ (as per the six million Holohoax fiction).”

These sentiments expressed to us by Icke’s fans are representative of the vast majority of those who contacted us after attending his show. They insist that Icke, an advocate for love and compassion, cannot possibly be antisemitic because he is only telling the truth about Jews. We would urge them to acquaint themselves with the International Definition of Antisemitism, recently adopted by the British government. It cites various examples of antisemitism, including:

  • Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions; and
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).

Many correspondents allowed their enthusiasm for defending Icke to lure them into another antisemitic conspiracy theory, insisting that accusations of antisemitism only exist to shut down criticism of Israel. The International Definition of Antisemitism identifies these practices as antisemitic, especially:

  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination (e.g. by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour);
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis; and
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.

But Kate Coley e-mailed us to inform us that: “David Icke may use a different definition of Zionism to the one that you use.” There is only one useful definition of Zionism: it is the aspiration of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancestral homeland — an ideal that has always been central to Judaism. Other definitions of Zionism are almost always manufactured by antisemites. Icke can be found on video clearly distinguishing between the Jews he approves of (those who disavow Israel) and those he regards as objectionable (Zionists). Over 90% of British Jews identify as Zionists.

A man calling himself “Neil” was scathing about the the Jewish right to self-determination: “I have come to learn a lot about Zionism and find it repulsive. All my friends and family understand the sickness that is Zionism, and all their friends and family have been duly enlightened.” Wendy Steele went further: “I have lived long enough to see the Israelis behave worse than the Nazis. On that, it was a great number of Jewish bankers who brought that pathetic wee man, Hitler to power.” A correspondent who identified himself only as “hocusfocus” agreed wholeheartedly: “It is evident to many of us now that the Israeli regime is akin to Nazi Germany”

A fan e-mailing under the name of “scousepies” was convinced that Israel is behind far-right extremisim: “Zionism is not Judaism. It bears no resemblance to it — it only hijacks the religion as a front for other activities. Same as the Vatican does with Christianity, same as the KKK does, same as any extremist minds warp their views and goals into a more acceptable front…Exposing a group of people who claim to be ‘Jews’ when in fact they are only using that religion as a front to hide the fact they are Satanists is not hating Jewish people.”

Max Johnson reminded us of a more modern conspiracy theory that is popular among antisemites: “The sad realisation that 9/11 was an inside job carried out by Israeli dual nationals in the Bush administration brought me to the conclusion; over the last 15 years we have been lied to and manipulated which is absolutely disgusting.”

E-mails continue to pour in from the many people all over the world that Icke has convinced that “Rothschild Zionists” are behind many of the world’s ills.

Icke is a modern-day antisemitic hate preacher who uses social media, his books and his stage performances to incite hatred towards Jewish people by repeating centuries-old libels, as well as the same conspiracy myths that were used by Nazi Germany to justify the Holocaust. His appearance at the O2 Apollo in Manchester was the only UK appearance of his international tour. Not only did the O2 Apollo allow Icke to address their packed venue for twelve hours, they profited from it. Campaign Against Antisemitism has written to Manchester City Council asking that they fine the venue an amount in excess of the profits from the evening and impose licence conditions so that this does not happen again.

You may wish to contact O2’s Chief Executive, Mark Evans, at [email protected] to let him know how you feel about the decision by the O2 Apollo, which O2 sponsors, to host a modern-day antisemitic hate preacher to address a sell-out audience for twelve hours. You may also want to contact Manchester City Council’s Licensing Unit at [email protected] setting out how you feel about the venue hosting speakers of this nature.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojvQWO6fonE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bUMVLHbRfs

Leeds Crown Court has heard that a 17-year-old prepared a viable homemade bomb in preparation for an “all-out race war”. The defendant is allegedly a member of National Action, a violent neo-Nazi group which recruits teenage children and university students. The Home Secretary designated National Action a proscribed terrorist organisation last month after a long campaign by Campaign Against Antisemitism and others.

Prosecutor Barnaby Jameson told the jury that the teenage defendant made a viable bomb using fireworks after seeking out instructions on the internet. He said that the defendant often wore a business suit, but beneath his respectable veneer he was an unabashed neo-Nazi who allegedly sent friends racist Snapchat messages, leading to police being alerted to what he was preparing.

When police entered his bedroom they found it festooned with Nazi flags including the swastika and the emblem of Hitler’s Waffen SS. His laptop screensaver was an image of a Nazi eagle over a Swastika and Hitler’s famous slogan: “Ein volk, ein reich, ein führer” (one people, one nation, one führer). Police found the bomb in a drawer.

According to the prosecution, police found that after he became involved with National Action, the defendant had written online: “Focusing on making homemade weapons [guns] and explosives, as well as amassing a collection of knives. We don’t have any right to bears arms, so the resistance has to learn to construct its own weapons.” He began attending National Action rallies and participating in sticker campaigns to spread their message, the prosecutor said. In early June, he wrote to a friend on Facebook Messenger: “The IRA is where we get most of our techniques from. We follow them religiously, the way they operated in an urban environment. The way they blended into the population. Urban guerrilla warfare is what we need to learn.” He also posted: “I wish the Nazis had won the war. I wish I could have lived back then and fought alongside the British free Korps, and had the privilege of praising the Führer. Hail Hitler!”

The court heard that the defendant attended a meeting with his mother last July at his college after being found to have put up racist posters. He allegedly dressed in a combat jacket and trousers and steel-capped army boots, and made clear his views that the Holocaust did not happen and that whites were more important than other races.

The prosecution alleges that the defendant was preparing an “all-out race war” and that he praised the methods of the man who murdered Jo Cox, writing on social media following the brutal murder: “Absolute f***ing legend. He’s a hero, we need more people like him to butcher the race traitors.” The defendant, whose name has not been released, denies a charge of preparing a terrorist act and an alternative count of making a explosive device. He allegedly told police: “I’ve simply been fooling around with fireworks and showing them off to my peers in my naivety; I have never had the intention to cause any harm to any person.”

The prosecutor told the jury: “As we will hear in due course, [the defendant] did something with a pipebomb that was less to do with ‘f***ing around with them’ and more to do with an ideological war he was waging.”

We are following the trial with interest.

As if attempting to inflict more public wounds on its tattered reputation, the once anti-racist Labour Party has today dropped its investigation into the rampant antisemitism at the Oxford University Labour Club (OULC), clearing the two members under investigation.

This verdict is an insult to the intelligence of the Jewish community, and adds that insult to the already traumatic injury to Labour’s once steadfast relationship with it. Jewish Students at Oxford have recounted in painful detail the incidents that took place.

Students testified that members of the OULC had called Auschwitz a “cash cow”. Jews were called “Zios”. They were asked to renounce Israel publicly before speaking. The dead Jewish victims of the Paris Hypercacher terrorist attack were mocked. Terrorist acts against Jews in Europe were rationalised. It was asserted that the banks were controlled by the “Paris-Tel Aviv axis” — all in clear breach of the International Definition of Antisemitism, a definition Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party have already shown to have been lying in saying they had accepted.

Following this, Labour Students was sent to investigate. Its findings were suppressed. Baroness Royall was commissioned to follow up, and although her positive findings for Labour were leaked (she found that there were rotten apples but no institutional problem), to her publicly expressed chagrin, those rotten apples were not exhibited. The ever more rancid, rotting pot was handed to Shami Chakrabarti, a former human rights barrister who proclaimed that the offenders would be dealt with under the terms of her new whitewash report, which introduced a system of secrecy over due process that would have made the Pinochet regime blush.

We can now see the fruits of her labours: with Ilyas Aziz and now, two un-named Oxford students, cleared without censure.

Within the small Jewish community, the Oxford students have told their story privately, as well as testifying for the Sunday Times. Here, in 2017, with the enormous weight of public evidence that antisemitic incidents took place, the only remaining way to profess that there was no actionable antisemitism in the OULC is to effectively call those who witnessed it liars.

From the case of the Oxford students, through Jeremy Corbyn’s stating that his brother was “not wrong” to characterise Louise Ellman MP’s complaints of antisemitism as politically motivated; to Diane Abbott and Len McCluskey’s public assertions that allegations of antisemitism in Labour were “smears” and “got up”; through Ruth Smeeth’s ordeal at the hands of Jeremy Corbyn himself as he stood by while she was attacked and consequently received 25,000 abusive messages including death threats; after our outcry at the silent readmission and public defence of Jackie Walker after she repeated the 1950s discredited canard that Jews were the authors of the slave trade; our protests at the failure to summarily expel Ken Livingstone for his offensive claim that Hitler supported Zionism; through Corbyn’s assertion that the respected Jewish journalist Jonathan Freedland’s thoughtful Guardian piece on Labour antisemitism represented “utterly disgusting subliminal nastiness”; and the video Corbyn himself released online characterising Jewish complaint as so much rubbish to be thrown on the floor: there is only one, single, clear message running through everything Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour Party has to say about our community: Jewish complaints are empty lies.

In 2017, lamentably and astonishingly, Her Majesty’s Opposition is resurrecting an ancient antisemitic charge against Jews: of dissembling. Jewish politicians, Jewish journalists and now Jewish students’ complaints are all similarly charged as being maliciously motivated. In this, the Labour Party has been guilty of what the International Definition of Antisemitism calls “employing sinister stereotypes” and invoking “… mendacious …demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews”.

The Labour Party itself is now in breach of the International Definition of Antisemitism. By the standard set by that definition, the Labour party is antisemitic and not safe for Jews; we further publicly call it out for lying in publicly saying it accepted the definition.

We call on Theresa May’s government, the courts, as well as Tom Watson and other senior Labour figures, to utilise the International Definition to oppose the Labour Party’s racism. It is no longer possible, in our view, to save the Labour Party from its own racism, but it is necessary to defend the Jewish community against what is becoming a waking nightmare.